Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the correct role for private insurance companies in providing universal health care?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:13 AM
Original message
Poll question: What is the correct role for private insurance companies in providing universal health care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Other
they should have no role other than fighting for the ever expanding elective plastic surgery market. I think "medical" insurance companies would be great at doing what they do now, except with elective procedures that people don't really need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. wouldn't the only people who buy coverage for plastic surgery be those planning on getting it?
it might be more appropriate to call that kind of policy a medical credit card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's an interesting idea
Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 09:44 AM by supernova
"medical credit card" - I think I like it, a future business opportunity for someone.

I think it's criminal that the insurance cos are denying care and not being sued out the yin yang for essentially practicing medicine without a license. Individuals without medical degrees are charged with this crime all the time. Why not an insurance company? After all, insurance companies are "individuals" and have "personhood" according to our law. I think until we get universal care, some crafty lawyer(s) could spend their careers on cases like this and reform the industry. That would be a good thing.

That's why I don't want them involved in the new system. It would be the fox guarding the hen house. Yeah, that'll work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Joan Rivers could be spokesmodel for medical credit card. Only problem:
she's had so much botox, she may not be able to move her mouth to talk about.

"whym voan vivehs un I wuv vu cusvetic expwess caht"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. BWAAHAHAHA!
:rofl:

Imagine celebs on late night infommercials showing off their boob jobs.

"Hello. I'm Jessic Simpson, and if you're like me, you could use a little extra up top. Just fill out an application for the new American Medical Express Card at your surgeon's office. You'll be approved right away. There's no chance you will be denied nor turned down. So get the rack of your hubby's dreams. Operators are standing by."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. and when they say 'operators' they cut to a surgeon standing over an empty operating table
We're SLASHING our prices on boob jobs, tummy tucks, vag tightening, and if you act now, we'll throw in a scrotal lift for your husband so his danglies don't drop all the way to his knees.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Google "plastic surgery loans" and check it out
http://www.implantforum.com/finance.html

Wonder what impact the credit crunch will have here, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. and they should cover
any form of medical treatment shown not to be effective.

If you want snake oil, you should get it from the private sector.

That is what capitalism excels in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. some policies cover that now because it's cheaper, has a placebo effect, and if you have cancer or
something expensive and you just go to the quacks, you'll die without getting all that expensive chemo and radiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yes, snake oil would be
Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 09:58 AM by supernova
fine too.

Though I would include an alternative therapy benefit in our Universal Care for things like acupunture, massage, or chiropractic, things that while not strictly "medical" do seem to help people feel better, and more importantly, are not harmful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have a hard time believing that in the real world we are just going to eliminate an industry
Whatever plan we come up with will incorporate the private insurance companies in one form or another.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. WE Won't
It will only happen when there's a bigger player to take its place.

Forgive my pessimism, but I work in music radio and have spent the last 20 years watching my industry swallow its own tail; as of now, the RIAA and friends are trying to eliminate music radio (and internet radio that's not owned by anyone with very, very deep pockets) altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Why? Its not like they produce anything...
Seriously, they don't, they are, at best, a money investment machine, for themselves, rather than others, they take our premiums, invest them for profit, and when we need the money for some health care costs, they say no. They produce nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. they are parasites, leeching some of the money out of the system that could have gone to health care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. I too wonder about another purge of jobs in our nation.
ICD10 coding was supposed to be the upcoming global standard, but I believe it is still being worked on and I don't believe there is a mandated use date yet. Standardization of health documentation is another big issue standing along side the EMR. I also surmise that our health records are as private, HIPAA notwithstanding, as our phone conversations and financial information, etc. If maintaining that ilusion of privacy, what new conditions will be "reportable" to our national dossier?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Apparently, we have a lot of socialists who need liquidation in KBR-built concentration camps.
To think of the nonsense of putting health above profits! It's revolutionary and dangerous and communistic! It must be destroyed as an idea! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. spoken like a true DLC capo in the camp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. LOL! And you actually have a problem
with us socialists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. yes. How come you've done so much in Europe but nothing for us here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. None...
They won't be needed if Medicare and Medicaid are the ones providing health care to everyone. Dismantle the companies and seize their assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. They could provide extended health benefits...
Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 11:05 PM by SidDithers
above and beyond what a single payer system covers.

That's the role they play here in Canada. My government plan covers almost all medical situations, but not everything. My extended health benefits costs my employer about $300 /mth for family coverage, and covers things like perscription meds, dental benefits, eyeglasses, some diagnostics, physiotherapy, and a bunch of other things like massage therapy and orthotics. Extended health also pays for an upgrade to a semi-private or private room for any hospital stays.

Sid

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. the government plan doesn't cover meds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Under special circumstances it does...
but most are not covered. 'Course, they're much less expensive up here to begin with.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Send them off planet to destroy the "independence day" space invaders.
If those guys had our health care system we wouldn't need Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum to save the world.



.html?hint=group

Uh oh. Maybe the private insurance companies ARE the independence day space invaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Not without selling some Alien Abduction policies first.
you say it'll never happen to you, but that's exactly when it happens!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. Selling auto insurance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC