|
i often think that dubia dubia 2 almost never happened- the upper classes in england, the usa and much of europe agreed with hitler and fascism and hohummed while the Spanish Republic, for example, was destroyed by the 'vast rightwing conspiracy'....had hitler not been so grasping, so goddam greedy, the fascist victory evolving today would have taken place back in the late 30's....dubia dubia 2 would not have happened had stupid hitler not literally forced the 'allies' to declare war on him, and the holocaust? what holocaust? all the talk about 'death camps' and military buildups and schemes to control the world via brute force would have been denied, memory holed, just like that. As it was, the upper classes nearly got caught playing footsie with the nazis anyway- Edward, duke of windsor, Prescott bush, charles lindberg were just 3 nazi sympathisers whose names became known! The true story of the complicity of our ruling elite with the fascists isn't known as it is; imagine if they had allied themselves with hitler, and discovered the holocaust when the millions were already dead! The story they tell us would have, ahem, focused on the good things instead of the bad (and the out-of-control liberal media would not have been around to create confusion etc, obviously).
"Babbitt" was published in 1926. In the 1960 Penguin edition afterword, here's the ending:
" The drift of our commercial culture in the forty years since ‘Babbitt’ appeared suggests that Sinclair Lewis did little to alter it, perhaps, but he was the first novelist to tell us explicitly into what stupid, and finally devastating social damnation we were drifting. Have we landed? Mark Schorer, University of California 1961 afterword to ‘Babbitt’ "
George dubia bush is just the logical conclusion of something depraved about our culture, and MAYBE it's time we face up to it. Reagan was not elected in 1980-too many people despise everything reagan stands for, and only by fixing the polls could a rightwing sychophant like reagan get any votes at all. Anyone who, back in 1970, or in 1980, or in 1990, or today, who thinks reagan was a power politician who 'represented' a constituent (rather then playact the repub leader etc) probably gives reagan too much credit, imho
|