|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 03:44 PM Original message |
Randi Rhodes had a good argument for NOT impeaching: avoiding pardons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. Pardons have nothing to do with impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. The Nixon pardon was pre-emptive and shut off prosecution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 07:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Bush could do that now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I think she's referring to.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. You can pre-emptively pardon, also. Pardon ahead of indictment.... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. I've been saying for a long time that, although I would support impeachment, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Impeachment is a protective mechanism. Criminal prosecution is a punitive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I could do both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. I get the feeling that around January 19, 2009 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Heh heh!!1!! That would mean just about everyone Senior WH official! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
8. If bush were impeached, at least he couldn't pardon anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Sure he could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. I was giving an axample if he were impeached and removed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icymist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
11. Impeachment is a tool the Founding Fathers created to check a bad president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 10:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I agree with you about the military though I don't think they are going to salute and jump off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
14. argument doesn't even make any sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
16. Face it. The Repugs will pardon any and everyone who gets convicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-31-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. shouldn't there be a constitutional amendment against pardoning people who worked for you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC