Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wes Clark on Tillman Case - Reopen Investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:10 PM
Original message
Wes Clark on Tillman Case - Reopen Investigation
Keith Olbermann: General Clark, let me turn from this story. We expected to spend all of our time with you tonight talking about this, but there have been two developments in the Pat Tillman story - a fiasco,here's not other word for it now - and this awful report tonight. Parsing through these documents obtained by the Associated Press that indicate that Army investigators were denied permission to see whether or not Pat Tillman's death in Afghanistan as an Army Ranger was a deliberate fragging, was a case of murder, even though the shots were seemingly so close together in his head that they, they looked to the doctors on the scene that they might've been fired from only ten yards away. Not only was there access denied here, but the Army lawyers were congratulating themselves in e-mail traffic from keeping this from becoming a criminal investigation. Do you think this case is still wide open?


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Absolutely, and it should be. The, the evidence of some problems is very, very clear. Mary Tillman and the Tillman family have been incredibly courageous in pursuing the truth in this, and the truth is not yet out. If there's even a hint that there was something like a homicide or a murder in this case, it should've been fully investigated and proved or disproved, and we don't really know how far up- Was it the Secretary of Defense's office? Was it the White House? Where did the idea that you shouldn't give any indication of what happened to Tillman. 'Just go ahead and go through with the burial ceremony. Give him the Silver Star.' Where did that- where was that idea blessed? You can be sure that that idea did not originate or stop at the Two- or Three-Star level. That was- someone approved that all the way to the top, because Pat Tillman was a political symbol used by the administration when it suited their purposes.


Keith Olbermann: Well, we have assumed from the beginning that that was exactly the scenario that this possibility that his, his death from friendly fire would, would somehow effect, in some way that neither of us able- ever been able to understand, somehow effect people's appreciation for his patriotism and sacrifice. Does it not begin to look more and more like that, that we were going the wrong direction in this, that they were not trying to protect something, something slightly negative from coming out, but in fact coming- protecting the accusation that his mother has made and has not gotten a lot of attention to that, that perhaps he was indeed murdered? Were we, were, were we actually underestimating what was being covered up here?


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: It's very possible. We, we just don't know, Keith. I think the responsible thing for the Pentagon to do and for the Congress to do is to demand that the investigation be reopened and people all the way up the chain of command to the very top discuss what happened, when, why, we get to the facts about why the, the murder charge wasn't fully investigated. I looked at some of the investigations. I looked at the tape. I looked at the rerun of the scene. I've met with the Tillman family. And honestly, the distance, even in- the investigators said that the shots were fired at less than a hundred meters, and okay the light was failing, but he had a clearly recognizable silhouette. His weapon was clearly visible - the type of weapon. It, it ,it's, it's really hard for people to understand this. The investigation needs to be reopened and followed through to its conclusion.

http://securingamerica.com/node/2577
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I so admire Wes Clark.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Every Time I See Him...
I think "presidential". If not that then Secretary of Defense or even Secretary Of State in the next administration would be nice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree, and he would be an excellent Secretary of State, one of the best.
Has he been out of the military long enough to be Secretary of Defense?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He's not out long enough
Although Congress could grant a waiver, I believe. I always thought if he wasn't to be President, I'd like SoS for him, but he would sure clean out the house on Iraq as SoD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. One credible snitch could blow the Tillman case wide open!!!
There are people who were there who know what REALLY happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. One thing about Wes...
He's been speaking out against the war so much that he has to be squeaky clean or the RW Spin machine would have found SOMETHING on him. He has cred on military issues and has been RIGHT about everything he predicted would happen in Iraq so far. Compared his record to the toadies that Bush now has running his occupation and the 'Cons like Krystal, Feith, Nordquist, et al who keep getting trotted out on the MSN as "experts".

Glad he's on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That is an excellent point
You know they will make up crap to throw at him if they have to, but we already saw the worst they could come up with against him when he ran in 2004 and the Republican noise machine went into overdrive to take down a 4 Star Democratic General who dared to run against Chicken Hawk war time president George W. Bush. It was pretty weak all things considered, and mostly aimed at discrediting Clark with Democratic voters, not swing voters. They don't have a real scandal to throw at Clark, but I'm sure they wish they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Well they did find something...
General Clark supported Michael Moore's right of free speech. That free speech thing is a kicker in right-wing circles.

And then they said that the General was a republican.... oh, wait a minute, those were other Democrats. jeesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm always shocked someone here, on DU, makes that
republican accuasation, especially since he continues to work so hard to get Democrats elected. I wish that those folks would just take some time and go to "securing america" and see the incredible list of things this man has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. The story was planted by Republicans
Aided and abetted by guys like Joe Lieberman.

Democrats were just stupid enough to fall for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think this scandal is not going to go away
It is good to have someone with the prestige of being a four star General on our side demanding an investigation that goes all the way to the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. I love Wes Clark. He is a reasonable, intelligent man
He may not be saying that a murder was definitely committed here, but he does raise the question about why no investigation was forthcoming about this. That problem alone seems to really point fingers at this as being more than what it appears. Why on earth they would hide the friendly fire thing was just weird. That does not seem enough of a reason to hide all this. Now that "the truth" has come out (all 2300 pages of it), one has to wonder why they decided to make this part public. What else are they hiding?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. He was so good on KO,
it's got to be heartbreaking for him to see the way this tragedy's unfolding. I'm sure he's digging behind the scenes to get to the bottom of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. As he has about the entire debacle
"...this is personal for me."

Yes it would be heartbreaking; he's seen the tapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Special Porsecutor needed for this
Actually a entire stable of SPs are needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC