Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK... Fess Up You DU Anti-Impeachment Pragmatists !!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 11:33 PM
Original message
Poll question: OK... Fess Up You DU Anti-Impeachment Pragmatists !!!
Let's stipulate for the sake of argument, that in the 2008 Elections, the Democrats take the presidency, and increase their majorities in both houses of Congress.

If that is what happens, and after swearing everybody in in January 2009, you believe:

:shrug:

Just curious how "pragmatic" y'all are???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course the caveat is "if".
Those that argue not to impeach either bush or Cheney do not consider anything but that we will take all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Know... Once Again We Have The Elmer Fudd Democrats...
"Be vewy, vewy, qwiet... wewr hunting the pwesidency."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Impeach and remove as soon as possible.
If there can be a worse betrayal by a supposed leader of a democratic state than lying to the citizens about why he is taking the nation to war, I can't think of what it could be.

Not only is that an impeachable offense, it is a war crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. After a flood of Presidential pardons in January 2009, what's left to prosecute?
Edited on Sun Jul-08-07 11:44 PM by TahitiNut
:eyes:

While pardons would not prevent prosecution in international courts, I seriously doubt the Inside-the-Beltway Club would permit such extradition and prosecution at all. Not for a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You Hit The Nail On The Head When You Said
A pardon doesn't work for International crimes and the crimes they are guilty of are intrenational. Hand them over to the world court or better yet to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Neither the US nor Iraq is a member of the ICC.
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 01:02 AM by TahitiNut
One of Dear Leader's acts in 2002 was to "unsign" the Rome Statute ... along with Israel. Afghanistan, however, is a member but I doubt the Karzai government would cooperate. Sadly, Cuba is not a member. Torture at Gitmo would otherwise fall under the ICC's jurisdiction. (Maybe someone should tell Fidel?)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. How About Paraquay
Or perhaps Canada could invite him up for another visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Time To End Presidential Pardons
or at least severly limit them. They haven't been used for much good in many years anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Presidential pardons are an essential check on the judicial sylstem
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 01:42 AM by Hippo_Tron
The founding fathers wrote them into the constitution for a reason. I would consider supporting an amendment saying that the president may not pardon anyone who committed a crime while serving as a member of his administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. They Suggested Something Similar On Air America
Exempting any member of the Executive Branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. I believe in prosecuting them for war crimes/crimes against humanity, but I doubt the Dem leaders...
will go that far. Likely, the crimes will be tried in Germany, since their constitution has a universal jurisdiction clause written in dealing with international war crimes if the nations responsible do not prosecute for those crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. Keep Moving Forward.
Which includes moving forward with investigations, as well as overhauling the rest of the government.

On a pragmatic level, it would be foolish to ignore the events leading to so much shit, but it would also be foolish to ignore the wreckage that must be fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick !!!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. The goverment needs to focus on solving problems related to
global warming, Iraq, health care, poverty, and education, among others.

Hauling Bush from his brush-clearing in Crawford and putting him in a country-club minimum security prison isn't going to put food on the table for a single mother with 3 kids. It isn't going to do anything about carbon emissions. It's not going to help a victim of cancer who's facing tens of thousands in medical costs. It won't help a child who can't afford to go to college. And it won't end the war either.

I'm tired of the fucking soap opera. I just want the government to do its fucking job.

Set up some little committee to investigate and prosecute the ex-Bush administration lecture circuit losers, but any government which makes that its central focus at the expense of the problems listed above is just as useless as the government we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC