Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reality check on bombs without oxidizers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:38 PM
Original message
Reality check on bombs without oxidizers
To be sure, a "bomb" such as the ones in London, consisting of gasoline and propane, could make a pretty big fire, but don't explosives really have to have a handy source of oxygen? I'm not trying to tell anybody how to make a bomb or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. You expect our terrorist leaders in the White House to think of everything?
They have other things on their minds to ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Depends on the explosive...
Some require more oxygen than others, usually the surrounding air, if the bomb isn't sealed airtight, is enough to create an explosion. Gasoline and Propane, if not in a sealed container, will explode in the right circumstances, using just the air as an oxidizer. You can demonstrate this yourself, get a plastic gas container, set up a remote ignition sourced, only put enough gasoline in to spread across the bottom of the container, then put the igniter above this, and wait ten minutes, then hit the switch/button to activate the igniter. Its more than a small fire, I'll tell you that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. you sound experienced. I saw something like that when I was in the 5th
grade. A friend eith a match and a a gas can. It went WHOOOMP and singed his eyebrows. Still, the device described in the news was very fuel-rich, and would have to be in a very large container to be scaled up to the one you describe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dairydog91 Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Depends...
On what you're detonating. In the case of a container of something that needs oxygen to detonate, just leave that container half-empty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Liquid gasoline does not burn. Gasoline vapor burns.
To demonstrate, as a youngster, I used to wow my friends by throwing a lit match into a bowl of gasoline. The match hit and was extinguished. Now, take that bowl, throw it in the air over a fan and a lit match and you will have a nice fireball.

In an engine, liquid gas will cause incomplete ignition resulting in black smoke. Getting gasoline to finely atomize is an issue in your ordinary passenger car with EFI as well as by 500+hp big block Ford-powered hot rod with a Holley 850 carb.

The stuff in that car was not a high-explosive like the oil and fertilizer bomb used at OK City. Propane tank explosions (I have been involved in such) would cause damage, but not like a real ME-style car bomb, and the gasoline would not add to it until the container it was in was ruptured and the contents vaporised by heat.

This was some sort of amateur job. Fortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. my take as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. looks like a response from Mr. Johnson on the ? of his incorrect level of fear:
Edited on Fri Jun-29-07 06:01 PM by FLDem5
FROM LARRY JOHNSON:
Nothing explodes and yet it is something? What alternate universe are you inhabiting? Unlike you, I've seen propane tanks blow. They make a really loud noise. But you need a pretty big fire or high explosive to get them to detonate. Neither present in this case. Yet, let's use the fear factor to hype terror. Makes for good politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think they would have just melted in the fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. thanks for the reponse
sorry, I edited my post, because I wasn't sure it made sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oxidizer = model rocketry
Bomb making = fuel + ambient oxygen + tamping + ignition

Try this sometime: take a block of C-4 explosive (fuel), set it on your concrete patio (ambient oxygen), and light it on fire with a cigarette lighter (ignition)

The result? Just a massively hot flame

Take that same setup (fuel, ambient oxygen, ignition), and lay a couple sandbags on top of it.

The result? No more concrete patio.

The sandbags provide tamping, which delay the expansion of gas.

You don't need C-4 to create the same effect. A controlled combustion of fuel in a small area creates a large explosion (think a modern rifle cartridge)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Are you saying C4 uses ambient oxygen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. No, you have to import it from someplace.
The best oxygen comes from a 1/4 square mile area in northern Tibet.

:sarcasm:

Kidding aside, yes...C-4 uses ambient oxygen (including the oxygen IN the explosive itself) (C3H6N6O6)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I think the word ambient would exclude that which
is in the explosive itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Take it from somebody who does this stuff for a living
The amount of ANY oxygen, ambient or otherwise, in the explosive train is the least of your worries, and usually not a factor. You primary concern is applying more than enough explosive material to the target to achieve the desired effects.

Insurgents in Iraq (and their counterparts in the UK, apparently) have gotten very adept at taking common flammable things and making big bombs out of them using commonly-acquired components. It's exceedingly simple to make a devastating bomb with any desired structure or personnel-defeating effects.

In this case, a propane tank wrapped with 16d nails will make for one hell of a large claymore mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Propane blows up real good on YouTube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC