Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald's Response To Libby's Request For Bond Pending Appeal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 06:45 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald's Response To Libby's Request For Bond Pending Appeal
Edited on Fri Jun-22-07 06:51 PM by kpete
Shorter Fitz: Send Libby to Jail
by emptywheel

Fitzgerald submitted his response to Libby's request for bond pending appeal today.http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/files/070622_govt_reply.pdf

Basically, it reiterates the points he made in last week's hearing on the issue, though in the written form that allows some snark.

.................

Congress Doesn't Need New Laws

The filing starts by undercutting Libby's Appointments Clause complaint with a simple reading of the law.

Remarkably, defendant's application, while suggesting that the AAG might have addressed the urgent conflict-of-interest issue by opting to seek new legislation from Congress ... contains no mention of the statutory provisions under which AAG acted. In fact, the delegation was made pursuant to the AAG's statutory authority under 28 USC 510 to delegate any of the functions of the Attorney General to any other officer of the DOJ.

This is where Team USA adopts the same dismissive attitude that Libby's new Appeals lawyer uses.

Defendant's argument so lacks merit that it does not present a substantial issue.

While that's not so persuasive, this bit of snarky logic is:

Defendant interprets the sentence stating that the Special Counsel's position was not "defined and limited by 28 CFR Part 600, the regulations providing for appointment of a Special Counsel from outside the Department, as freeing the Special Counsel from obeying any and all Department regulations. Defendant's logic runs like this: under 600.7(a), an outsider appointed as a Special Counsel must comply with all Department rules and regulations, so if a Department insider is appointed with the proviso that he is not "defined and limited" by Part 600, then the Department insider does not have to follow Department rules and regulations. That bit of sophistry was roundly rejected by the district court, and rightly so.

more at:
http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2007/06/shorter-fitz-se.html#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Get thee to the Greatest page
and Get Scooter in jail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the link, much appreciated!
Fitzgerald et al make short work of taking apart the motion by the Libby defense team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It is good,
isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Very good, imo
I must admit I had to laugh thinking the Libby defense won't even be able to use the ridiculous "wordy" complaint regarding this response as they have used regarding Judge Walton. This response is short, to the point while being very thorough in citing case law, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can't cry because your testimony wasn't backed up by a "memory expert"
when you decided not to give the damn testimony!

Quit whining, Scootie. Martha Stewart is more of a man than you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL, too true! I also just love how Libby is crying foul
because the supporting documents, allowed through the CIPA hearings to be used to SUPPORT Libby's testimony, were not allowed when he decided, as is his right, not to testify. Documents to be used in SUPPORT of testimony are not, in themselves, to be used in PLACE of testimony as his defense team well knows and also knows how LAME their argument is on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. What I would like for Mr. Fitzgerald to have included...
"If the Independent Counselor had not been deemed an "inferior" officer, as Mr. Libby claims, the IC would have continued his tenure & gone beyond the bounds of jurisdiction to see that every WH official, particularly those who gave direction to Mr. Libby in this matter, was prosecuted to the full extent of the law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. What is sophistry you ask?
sophistry

noun
a deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning in the hope of deceiving someone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Snap!
With regard to the Appointments Clause and its relation to the CIPA affidavit argument, and the fact that they waited until now to mention it:

"That argument is as unpersuasive as it is untimely."

More defense mincemeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. This whole matter is a smokescreen
and becomes moot when "The Decider" issues a pardon. All prosecutions will have to be on hold until the Nazi scumbag Bush is out of office, that is if he doesn't declare himself "Decider For Life" much in the same way Idi Amin did in Uganda.
Idi Amin's brain was rotting from syphilis. Could the same thing be said of the Bush Administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ole Libby is truely afraid of jail
This is just too funny but I do believe ole Libby thought he would NEVER end up in jail but he's going!! He's probably scared shitless.. Oh it will be a beautiful day when he reports to jail!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC