Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Justice Scalia is even crazier than you think.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 07:43 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Justice Scalia is even crazier than you think.....
Scalia is now using the TV show "24" to explain the Constitution....

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/06/scalia_and_tort.html

The Supreme Court Justice cites Jack Bauer and the Hollywood torture show "24" as relevant background for constitutional jurisprudence:

"Jack Bauer saved Los Angeles. ... He saved hundreds of thousands of lives," Judge Scalia said. Then, recalling Season 2, where the agent's rough interrogation tactics saved California from a terrorist nuke, the Supreme Court judge etched a line in the sand.
"Are you going to convict Jack Bauer?" Judge Scalia challenged his fellow judges. "Say that criminal law is against him? 'You have the right to a jury trial?' Is any jury going to convict Jack Bauer? I don't think so.

"So the question is really whether we believe in these absolutes. And ought we believe in these absolutes."
Earth to Justice Scalia: Jack Bauer does not exist. But the assumption that he does can lead to a lot of unusual places:


Even if a real terrorist who suffered mistreatment is released because of complaints of abuse, Judge Scalia said, the interruption to the terrorist's plot would have ensured "in Los Angeles everyone is safe." During a break from the panel, Judge Scalia specifically mentioned the segment in Season 2 when Jack Bauer finally figures out how to break the die-hard terrorist intent on nuking L.A. The real genius, the judge said, is that this is primarily done with mental leverage. "There's a great scene where he told a guy that he was going to have his family killed," Judge Scalia said. "They had it on closed circuit television - and it was all staged. ... They really didn't kill the family."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just had to open this thread.
Crazier than I already think Scalia is? That is a very high hurdle indeed. Don't tell me, he started crying. Quack quack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought this was a joke! Sorry to say it's not
This was during a conference in Canada that Scalia made these comments. This guy needs a mental evaluation and quick....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, he does need a mental evaluation!!
At least that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dan QUAYLE was ridiculed out of office for fighting a fictional Murphy Brown
Standards have dropped----well, obviously, if Shrub can be in the WH...who can't?!!1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. I guess I went to law school 20 years too early!
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 10:18 PM by mentalsolstice
Back in the olden days (I took Con Law I & II in 1988-89) we had to pore through hornbooks and treatises 'til the early morning hours. To think, all you have to do these days is watch an hour-long TV show!

And I also had to walk 10 miles in the snow, barefoot, to get to my classes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. You'll notice
that he didn't draw references from Law & Order. Doesn't his TV get that show?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Isn't he usually pissed off about the SCOTUS members quoting foreign laws...
as justifications for their decisions? Of course I guess 24 is an American show, so there's not a conflict.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC