Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If this is the price we must pay to win, I'm not sure its worth it.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 11:38 PM
Original message
If this is the price we must pay to win, I'm not sure its worth it.
"Science is a gift of God to all of us and science has taken us to a place that is biblical in its power to cure. And that is the embryonic stem cell research."

Nancy Pelosi

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007/06/quote-of-day-and-in-bad-way-by-tristero.html

I like Nancy...but this is insulting. I'm going to try and pretend she didn't say it but isn't there room in this country for a party that believes in intellectual honesty? I say there is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't care about that statement.
And I'm certainly not a believer. If I were religious, I would believe that science indeed was a gift from God, however; therefore, I see nothing strange about this, provided that the real, material-based scientific method is upheld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right. We'll just pretend that a superman gave it to us. I am not being snarky.
Edited on Sat Jun-09-07 12:44 AM by Dhalgren
I know it sounded like it, but I really wasn't. Think of all of the other items and issues that the fundies get their shrouds in a wad over. All of those things could be gifts from ____________ (fill in the blank)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. I know it isn't
We've put up with the right using religion to persuade people politically for TOO LONG. Now we have to put up with it from the Dems? Yeah, pandering to the faithful has worked so well for this country so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Really. When did they start doing that?
And why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. The religious forum the Dem candidates did this week
I don't know for whom or why other than that I seem to remember reading here that it was sponsored by a respectable religious organization, and I see no other reason why than pandering. When has a religious forum been done for the candidates before?

The Dems started waving their faith around a while ago, last year I think, and it was greeted cynically then...by people here AND on the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. You missed my signature quote from Carter?
I could dig up the quote I posted from Al Gore in 2000, talking about his faith. I bet there are quotes from Clinton too, although they are probably hard to find, given how much the Clenis has been written about. Or the Reverend Jesse Jackson speaking to the Democratic National Convention in 1984
"Tonight we come together bound by our faith in a mighty God, with genuine respect and love for our country, and inheriting the legacy of a great party, the Democratic Party, which is the best hope for redirecting our nation on a more humane, just and peaceful course." Jesse Jackson

It's not pandering if our candidates are genuine. It is being pushed by Jim Wallis who perhaps wants to show that Christians can be progressives and vice versa, but it's hardly new for Democrats to mention their faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. There's a difference
There's a difference between 'mentioning' their faith, which I've never had a problem with although I'm atheist, and inserting it into political discourse at the level I now see. The clips I saw of the Dems religious forum sickened me. It's pandering and I find it as off-putting as what the Repugs have done. The Dems should be raising the level of discussion, not competing with the Repugs in a race to the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wtf? Who IS this person? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I know...freaks me out.
I simply do not get religious people especially when they make me adhere to their beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Has Nancy recently been converted?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. sounds like it...from Catholic to right wing looney. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. There is no benefit to us to engage in this kind of rhetoric.
It's blowing up all over the Republics and it will blow up all over us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Holy moly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Democrats will forever and always be forced to pander to the religious
Not until the Senate is done away with will the Democrats not have to pander to religious fundamentalists. Two Senators per state, regardless of population, means the south and the midwest will always have a disproportionate amount of power.

It's why American cities are crumbling under social decay. Republican policy combined with religious irrationality that supports such Republican policy, and the corporate power structure that maintains the rigged system that allows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Wow - what a freaky coincidence. lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. Just a politician pandering to the stupid American masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. I Think It's A Great Statement. What's The Problem?
Where's the insult?

Oh, wait, forget it, I see. It's the whole 'if there's any hint of religion I must hate it and act insulted' concept. Gotcha. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't like her too tough, but I think she's just speaking metaphorically nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. She's brilliant
That's the exact way to talk to these idiotic religous morons. Science is nothing but what God has put here anyway, so how the HELL can you object to it. You friggin' idiot.

No, that's not what she said, but it is what she meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC