Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interracial Couple Denied Marriage By Justice Of The Peace In Louisiana

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 04:12 AM
Original message
Interracial Couple Denied Marriage By Justice Of The Peace In Louisiana
Edited on Sat Oct-17-09 04:22 AM by democracy1st
 
Run time: 09:46
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdFDu55Efa8
 
Posted on YouTube: October 17, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: October 17, 2009
By DU Member: democracy1st
Views on DU: 773
 
From CNN: Interracial Couple Denied Marriage By Justice Of The Peace Keith Bardwell In Louisiana - 10/16/09


(AP) NEW ORLEANS A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have. Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.

"I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way," Bardwell told the Associated Press on Thursday. "I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else."

Bardwell said he asks everyone who calls about marriage if they are a mixed race couple. If they are, he does not marry them, he said.

Bardwell said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. He came to the conclusion that most of black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society, he said.

"There is a problem with both groups accepting a child from such a marriage," Bardwell said. "I think those children suffer and I won't help put them through it."

If he did an interracial marriage for one couple, he must do the same for all, he said.

"I try to treat everyone equally," he said.

Bardwell estimates that he has refused to marry about four couples during his career, all in the past 2 1/2 years.

Beth Humphrey, 30, and 32-year-old Terence McKay, both of Hammond, say they will consult the U.S. Justice Department about filing a discrimination complaint.

Humphrey, an account manager for a marketing firm, said she and McKay, a welder, just returned to Louisiana. She is white and he is black. She plans to enroll in the University of New Orleans to pursue a masters degree in minority politics.

"That was one thing that made this so unbelievable," she said. "It's not something you expect in this day and age."

Humphrey said she called Bardwell on Oct. 6 to inquire about getting a marriage license signed. She says Bardwell's wife told her that Bardwell will not sign marriage licenses for interracial couples. Bardwell suggested the couple go to another justice of the peace in the parish who agreed to marry them.

"We are looking forward to having children," Humphrey said. "And all our friends and co-workers have been very supportive. Except for this, we're typical happy newlyweds."

"It is really astonishing and disappointing to see this come up in 2009," said American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana attorney Katie Schwartzmann. She said the Supreme Court ruled in 1967 "that the government cannot tell people who they can and cannot marry."

The ACLU sent a letter to the Louisiana Judiciary Committee, which oversees the state justices of the peace, asking them to investigate Bardwell and recommending "the most severe sanctions available, because such blatant bigotry poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the administration of justice."

"He knew he was breaking the law, but continued to do it," Schwartzmann said.







Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/interracial-couple-denied_n_322784.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. He should be fired and taken to court for civil rights violations - prison for him

The judge is useless. Perfectly useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobTheSubgenius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is beyond amazing. It's completely incomprehensible.
I'm sure that couple is statute-barred from suing, but they should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressOnTheMove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's good it's been addressed that sends a message, but they shouldn't take it to heart...
Edited on Sat Oct-17-09 05:20 AM by ProgressOnTheMove
the most important thing is what they feel for each other. The wisest thing is to never let other peoples pain be your pain(pain in that those folks that stood in the way are damaged goods). This whole presidency is process of learning on the right and it'll work out more positive ont he other side. That's not to say it'll all end overnight but things will have moved on some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting take from the other side.
The Freepoid's reactions to this story are, for the most part, the same as here, with two exceptions. Some believe the JOP should be free to make this decision based on his personal beliefs, while others see it as a scheme to discredit Republicans, as Bardwell was once a Democrat. Now he is a registered Republican. As we all know, racism is a liberal thing (facepalm!).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. "They use my bathroom."
Makes no sense to me. As though the bathroom is sacred and he lets them into his sacred abode (pardon the pun).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Maybe that's a reference to the good ole days
if a black person was allowed to enter a white persons house, it had to be through the back entrance. I don't think servants were allowed to use the "regular" bathroom. There was usually a bathroom in a garage or work-shed for their use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC