Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Answering reader questions online, NYT editor Keller ducks Iraq query

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:21 AM
Original message
Answering reader questions online, NYT editor Keller ducks Iraq query
Editor and Publisher: Keller Answers Queries from Readers, But Ducks Question on Iraq
By E&P Staff
Published: April 10, 2006

NEW YORK The new “Talk to the Newsroom” feature at The New York Times’ online site launched this week with questions solicited by the paper's executive editor, Bill Keller. Other editors will take their turn in coming weeks.

On day one, Keller responded to several knotty questions, sometimes at length, discussing subjects such as story placement, his policy that prohibits reporters from insinuating their opinions into their articles, and why the Times held the NSA spying scoop for so long.

However, he also, admittedly, ducked one particularly probing query, which attempted to learn whether he regrets proclaiming himself a “hawk” on an Iraq invasion in 2003 before the war. Here is that Q and the A.

Q. In your columns, before you were appointed executive editor, you proclaimed yourself to be a "hawk" with regard to the then impending Iraq war. In retrospect, do you still stand by that opinion?
-- Heidi Miller

A. That's an excellent question, which, I apologize, I'm obliged to duck. In my current job it's important that I endeavor to keep my opinions to myself and out of the paper. To do otherwise risks giving readers the impression that the paper is driven by a political agenda, which it is not. (This attempt to segregate opinion from news is also the reason that in my current job I have no authority, none, over the editorial and Op-ed pages.) When editors are partisans, there is also a risk that reporters, whom we exhort to be impartial, might tailor their writing to the editor's perceived convictions....

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002315070
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC