S. Hersh telling Saludad O'Brien that what he said is just the opposite. H

[rodeodance]

e said in his article that the miliary was asked to present a range of options-a nuclear weapon attach was but one of many (regarding how to attach Iran). He is not say the military approves of this.

[rodeodance]

1. He also said that some senior military officers will resign if this option

is not taken off the table.

[postulater]

4. Feingold said Saturday that all options must be on the table for Iran

He considers Iran a true threat.

[rodeodance]

8. If he is including nuclear weapons, I am very surprized. Did he say this?

[postulater]

9. Yes he did, and I was surprised too.

It was in a direct question about Iran.

[tishaLA]

2. What does that mean?

"what he said is just the opposite"? I know what he said about Iran and the chimp considering the use of nuclear "bunker busters," but what is the opposite?

[rodeodance]

3. not sure what S.O'brien was talking about as I came in late-but he was

disagreeing with her opening comments.

[acmejack]

5. Psyops!

This is their counter move to Iran's war game with the radar evading missiles and rocket powered torpedoes and such.

[rodeodance]

6. now, on Imus, Andrea Mitchell saying that Europe is in a tizzy about the

Sye Hersh story.

[rodeodance]

7. also saying that some are misreading the story--the military has always

had contingency plans--nuclear option is one of many.