Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Leak Path: Cheney, Libby, Woodward

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:05 AM
Original message
CIA Leak Path: Cheney, Libby, Woodward
CIA Leak Path: Cheney, Libby, Woodward
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Monday 06 March 2006

In mid-June 2003, when former Ambassador Joseph Wilson's criticism against the White House's use of pre-war Iraq intelligence started to make national headlines, Vice President Dick Cheney told his former chief of staff and close confidant I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby to leak classified intelligence data on Iraq's nuclear ambitions to a legendary Washington journalist in order to undercut the charges made against the Bush administration by the former ambassador.

On June 27, 2003, Bob Woodward, the Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, became the first journalist to whom Libby leaked a portion of the classified National Intelligence Estimate that purportedly showed how Iraq tried to acquire yellowcake uranium from Niger.

This story is based on interviews with current and former administration officials who work or worked at the CIA, the State Department and the National Security Council. All of the individuals are familiar with the events that took place in the days that led up to Libby's meeting with Woodward and other journalists in which the NIE was discussed.

More

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/030606Z.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. For those interested
in more on the case, including Mr. Woodward's finding out about Plame, here is a link to Fitzgerald's most recently filed court document. Note the last sentence on page 14, section 39, regarding Mr. Rove.
http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/files/fitz_response.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. # 39
"Beyond that, most of the reporters have published accounts of what they learned and how Mr. Cooper published articles twice about his conversations with Mr. Libby and Mr. Rove. Ms.Miller published her account of her conversation with Mr. Libby. Mr. Novak has published a brief description of how he learned the information, albeit declining to name his sources (redacted). Mr. Libby indisputably knows at least one of Mr. Novak’s sources (redacted). Mr.Libby testified in the grand jury that Rove told Libby that Novak was publishing a column about Wilson’s wife before it was ever published."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. So I guess the lesson about conspiracies is that -
- no, you can't keep them secret when too many are involved. This sounds like insurrection in the ranks. Cheney pushed them too far. Which is interesting because John Dean in the seminar the other night said that the turning point for the Nixon WH came from within, when the staff could no longer stomach the lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. As a rule,
a good criminal can think of about 20 ways to cover their crimes; a very bright one may come up with 50 or 60 ways. But a good detective has 100 ways to catch you. Add more criminals to the mix, both good and bright, and the math always comes to favor that good detective. Always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. you know, they always argue with us that such a conspiracy couldn't happen
because too many people would be in on it and how could that many people keep a secret - and the fact is that they cannot keep the secret, at least the honest and troubled ones among them cannot. Once again we rely on the permanent government of honest and hard-working people to stymie the neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. A sad thing
is that the truth is being kept captive, too often hidden from public view. One example should do: there are still "journalists" and expert talking heads (Sean Hannity) who insist that Valerie Plame Wilson was not covert. Older DUers will recall that I assured readers numerous times that the first witness called before the original grand jury was from the Agency, and documented her status. Now, of course, that was never reported anywhere,because it was secret. Thus, in January, Team Libby filed motions that ranged from serious to nonsense, including a demand of proof of Plame's status.

While Mr. Hannity continues to deny reality, DUers should have noted that the Feb. 13 Newsweek had a two paragraph article that was headlined "The CIA Leak: Plame Was Still Covert." It read, in part, "Newly released court papers could put holes in the defense of Dick Cheney's former Chief of Staff, I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby ..... Patrick Fitzgerald found that Plame had indeed done 'covert work overseas' on counterproliferation matters in the past five years, and the CIA 'was making specific efforts to conceal' her identity...."

Of course, the reckless actions of the WHIG, under the directions of VP Cheney, ended the option of having her continue in the work being done to protect American cities from possible attacks. Thanks, Dick.

We are seeing the beginnings of a very negative trend. The previous attacks on the media are going to increase dramatically in the upcoming months. It will not only be the attacks on CBS and Dan Rather; it will include sly attacks on progressive sources such as our friends at Raw Story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Link to the other (minutes later) thread on this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. thanks! Looks like I needed more !!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC