Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Knight-Ridder article links Harry Reid to Abramoff.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 12:51 PM
Original message
Knight-Ridder article links Harry Reid to Abramoff.
Edited on Wed Jan-04-06 01:00 PM by yodermon
What is the real scoop here, people? I grow weary of how this faux balancing act continues to trump the truth.

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/13541679.htm


...The scandal threatens to engulf several high-ranking lawmakers from both major political parties :eyes:, including:

- Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, the chairman of the House Administration Committee, whose Web page identifies him as the "11th most powerful member of Congress." He took a golf trip to Scotland on Abramoff's tab, but says he did nothing wrong.

- Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, who was forced to step down last fall as House majority leader when he was indicted on a campaign-finance charge that isn't related to the Abramoff case. DeLay denies any wrongdoing in taking overseas trips financed by Abramoff. His spokesman said Tuesday that all of DeLay's actions were approved by the House ethics committee.

- Rep. John Doolittle, R-Calif., the secretary of the House Republican Conference, who took campaign contributions from Abramoff and whose wife was hired by an Abramoff foundation. Doolittle denies that his intervention in a California Indian casino case, which would've helped Abramoff, was connected to his relations to the lobbyist.

- Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., the Senate minority leader, who's denied that his intercession in an Indian-casino case that would've helped Abramoff was linked to a $5,000 contribution from an Abramoff client.
...



edited to remove stupidity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. This has been debunked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Repub plan: confuse, confuse, confuse
Why bribe the Dems? What power did they hold? This is the standard Rethug plan when they get in trouble: throw up as much mud as possible and try to get it to tar Dems and confuse the public.

This is a Republican scandal and republican corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. At this point, I don't really care.
Let the chips fall where they may. Democrats SHOULD be calling for investigations into EVERYONE. Reid, if anything, got money from a CLIENT that Abramoff SWINDLED. That does not make him guilty of anything, and an investigation will bear that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. he is the only dem that has my eye. he has also made the statement
he is not involved. there is also a vote. i tend to htink he isnt involved from what i am hearing. but i will have to wait and see, along with most of us. twice he has refuted this. once was a while ago and he was very forceful and made a flat out statement this was wrong and those involved should be punished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. from an Abramoff client - but not from Abramoff himself.
I'm sure he had lots of clients and some of them may have made donations of their own, having no relationship to this scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Of money from 20 tribes, perhaps a half dozen were Abramoff clients
Granted they - Abramoffs - were the casino - meaning large - contributors.

But Knight Rider has run off the rails and indeed can point to no Abramoff requested vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Exactly!
This meme by the right wing will be shot down but the inference that the dems were involved will remain in the public's mind unless it is publicly and strongly shot down, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Chart below shows not a dime of his own money going to Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Receiving contributions from the Indian tribes is legal
from what I have read and, as the tribes have long contributed to dems, does NOT impugn Reid as being part of the Abramoff scandal, imo, unless his votes and position changed after receiving the monies from what he had supported prior to the contribution.

I find the desperate attempt by the media to tar and feather democrats as equal partners with the republicans on the Abramoff scandal/crimes is beyond pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Steve Thomma tends to spin for BushInc when things look bad. What a
disgrace to the normally objective DC bureau at KR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Knight-Ridder is trying to sell off its papers
and has made sure that it will only be picked up by the uber-rich intent on keeping Repukes in control . . . they refused to let unions bid on any single newspaper . . . they would sell the entire unit as one whole piece, or the bid is off . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC