Thought : Scooter Libby doesn't have superiorS (note the capital S)

[rpgamerd00d]

The document says that he was authorized to leak the info by is superiorS.

Cheney is (was) his ONLY superior (singular).

To use the plural, superiorS, would, by definition, include ...







... SHRUB.


:wow:
:popcorn:

[bullimiami]

1. right, as cheneys chief of staff his only superiors were cheney and bush.

they are traitors.

[punpirate]

2. Sort of right...

... Cheney was his direct superior, but Libby also served Bush as a security advisor. So, he did have superiors, plural. It's even possible that in the org chart of the White House, Bush's chief of staff, Andrew Card, was over Libby.

[Sydnie]

3. Not true - He did wear two hats

Two for Cheney and one for blivet**. He HAD superiorS!

[Botany]

4. hey buddy

I checked w/ a friend of the family who has studied the Presidency

Yes there could be more then one superior to that list but it would be a very short list

Bush
Cheney
Rove
Rice (he worked in her dept. too)
Hadley
and maybe Andy Card.

according to my expert friend (trust me he is a real expert) Anybody who has been given the
Authority to "speak for the President" could be considered Libby's superior but still it is a
very short list.

[Sydnie]

6. I can't wait! There is so much scandal it's hard to know where to

start, like a great political smorgasbord for liberals!

[Viva_La_Revolution]

7. he was Cheney's chief of staff and

Bush's "Assistant to the President".

TWO supervisors. I find nothing showing that Rover was his superior.

I bow to Botany's expert though, cause I'm just an amateur. :)

[tridim]

5. Occam's Razor says

The senior WH staff had a meeting and decided as a group to leak Plame's name, Libby got the job because he had direct access to the media.

Why would only Cheney know?