Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

20,000, to be sent as early as next week?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:06 AM
Original message
20,000, to be sent as early as next week?
I thought I heard a propaganda guy say that yesterday on the t.v., that the troops are already being given their orders and the wheels are already turning on the 'surge', and they're just waiting for w to finish reading the speech dick wrote for him.

I also heard that they are mostly war weary second or third timers, and a lot of unprepared newbies being rushed into battle.

Wrong way bush is at it again, doing exactly the opposite of what should be done, going in exactly the wrong direction with wild abandon, because that's what he was told to do by his masters.

This whole sickening tragedy is kicking into phase two, deliberately designed and timed for the year 2007 by the neo conazis all along.

Apparently all we can do is stand by slack jawed and horrified, frozen in fear, confusion and impotence, while thousands more die in vain. Sad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. And this does not count the 5-6,000 Navy types on the second
Carrier Group that is about to get to the gulf... :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. My friend's son is a Marine who has been over there twice
He has been waiting to see a VA doc for 18 months for PTSD. He has attempted suicide. And he has to go back.

He is 23 and his youth has been spent in Iraq. Damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Jesus!...they must be desperate.
That is a horrible tragedy, too bad the president has no soul with which to give a fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. I know a bunch of guys
who got their orders 2-3 months ago to go to Iraq in January.

Apparently, Bush has been preparing for this surge for at least a few months.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yup. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. The wheels are a-fixin' to fall off of Bush's miscarriage real soon.
What do the surge and the Repub do nothin' congress have in common? They don't do nothin'...

All the things that Bush has promised us would fix Iraq so far, have come and gone and nothing has worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. When we started this mess the WH asked for 87 B and look now,
I heard some one say from the House that three things could be done. But I am not sure how it would work. He said some thing about over sight into how money was spent and they could not pay for the new troops. I sort of missed what he means. I do not see the House stopping money and I do not know how they can divided it up to go to this or that in a way to cut troops. It must be able to be done as they set up money for Navy and air force etc. I think this is why all the Dem. are out to see what way the wind is blowing and they will do some thing like that. Slow up tax money to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. The time for the troop surge was when they invaded Iraq.
They should have NEVER gone in with less than 350,000 troops like the generals wanted. They by-passed all those little towns on the rush to get to the photo op rich prize called Baghdad. They never mopped up in all those little towns and took the weapons away from the crazies. Now the troops are paying for Karl's photo ops in Baghdad, with their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Right on and you can be sure these new troops are already gone
Then he will ask for the money. Face it, we have this war for two more years. No roofs for Bush. Then he can blame it on someone else. I liked the Pa. Dem. plan of putting the troops around the country and if asked to come back, maybe. C-span had a man, Luttwak, yesterday that seemed to know a lot and I liked what he said. He said we could do better with just 20,000 men who stayed in camps in Iraq and came out as needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Smart (i.e. evil) move on their part to do this right away
Put the troops in harms way AND THEN have the Dems. vote to cut the funding.

This has Rove written all over it.

This is Rove's war strategy and that is F'ing dangerous. The 'surge' is solely a political move. :(


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. absolutely political
to protect Bush from having to put a period on his failure, and, as a wedge issue, as you pointed out.

Still, Democrats have enough political cover from the public to act without being permanently branded by any divisive rhetoric the republicans might respond with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. the time to poop or get off the pot
forgive the crudeness - but it's time to poop or get off the pot with Iraq

either we stabilize the country or get the hell out of there.

as far as I can tell - this latest "plan" is just bush farting on the pot and claiming to have had a bowel movement

whether or not bush leaves/is removed from office now or not until 2009 - the end result is going to be the same - the whole stinking mess will be someone else's problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC