Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I need DU help! If you know about Trademarks, and can apply for one, click here!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 03:56 PM
Original message
I need DU help! If you know about Trademarks, and can apply for one, click here!
Edited on Fri Jan-05-07 03:57 PM by rpgamerd00d
I wish I could do this myself, but I cannot, so I need the help of someone on DU.

I need someone to apply for a Trademark.

In order to do so, you have to show that you are using it, or intend to use it, in intertate commerce for a good or service. Note, that a Blog that generates some kind of revenue would qualify for this.

So, you're probably wondering what is it that we need to trademark?

Simple.

"The Official Truth Squad".

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

We need a logo that looks like the one the Repukes use, because the Trademark application requires an example of the Trademark.

So, we need:
1) a graphic "The Official Truth Squad".
2) Someone to file the application that is willing to establish it as official, meaning actual intent to use it in business (like I said, a Blog would likely qualify).

Anyone ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is for a REGISTERED trademark, and isn't necessary
Just put a TM next to it (if you are selling a product, SM if you sell a service), but NOT a circle-R (the registered mark). If you use the circle-R instead of the TM, without actually registering the mark, you forfeit the right to trademark forever. Save your money, just put a TM on it, put it on a letterhead and business card, and mail them to yourself -- a USPS postmark is valid proof of when you first used the mark.

(This is not meant to be a substitute for genuine legal advice. I am not a lawyer, but hold hundreds of copyrights and a bunch of trademarks.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Would that be good enough to sue the Repukes in Congress?
I want to prevent them from having their retarded "The Official Truth Squad" lie sessions.
Can I shut them down without being fully registered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If you plan to sue, you should register
But be forwarned...it can be an expensive process. Trademark searches (to be sure you haven't stepped on someone else's mark), lawyer's fees, application fees. Unless you're very serious about doing this, I wouldn't recommend it. Especially if they've already used that "The Official Truth Squad" line somewhere else. All they have to do is prove that they were using it before you registered it (which could actually go against you in other ways, ie; an TM attorney could theoretically counter-sue you for trying to scam their name.

Tread lightly.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ahh, bummer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You should get it notarized to prove you trademarked it before the Repubs used it.
Edited on Fri Jan-05-07 04:11 PM by Selatius
If you can go to the bank, get it notarized by a public notary, and prove you had it before the Repubs used it, you should be good in a court of law. That's my opinion on it, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Notorizing or a postmark
Even better, mail it to an out-of-state "client" and have him mail it back. But DON'T EVER OPEN THE ENVELOPE. All you want is the postmark. File it, and it is your proof should you ever wind up in court. Plus, by mailing it across state lines, you validate the "interstate commerce" angle.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. But the repubs have used the slogan for over a year now. On tape.
I guess this is moot then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah. Drop it.
It was a neat idea, but not practical.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Too generic a term.
It would just get kicked back after six months or so in review hell.

Save your $300+.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. *ahem* I work in Intellectual Property Law
Edited on Fri Jan-05-07 05:06 PM by El Fuego
It's easy to apply for a trademark without an atty, but there's a $375 filing fee, per class. If it's not being used, you just file an intent-to-use application.

Also, you can trademark the graphic with the words, or just trademark the phrase itself, or both if you want pay for two separate applications. Doing the words alone gets you broader protection.

Trademarks have to go through a prosecution process, and if it's deemed to be "confusingly similar" to some other mark it would be rejected, but you could respond with arguments which show that it isn't. If it's met with some resistance at the PTO you might need the assistance of someone with experience.

After the mark is allowed, it is published in the Offical Gazette for purposes of opposition. If it does look just like the repuke logo, they will probably oppose the registration of your mark. And if you fight it, an opposition proceeding will cost you big big BIG buckaroos!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC