Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Filibuster v. Cloture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:49 AM
Original message
Filibuster v. Cloture
People are pissed because they saw that the GOP didn't get 60 votes on the Alito nomination.

"A filibuster would have worked!" goes the refrain.

No.

Had cloture failed yesterday, I guarantee the GOP would have found their 60 votes. Bet the farm, the house and the kid's tuition on it.

They didn't get 60 votes today because they didn't need them. Simple as that. When cloture failed, it freed up GOPers from moderate states to vote 'no' if they wanted to. Had cloture failed, those moderate-state GOPers would have felt the whipsong all over their backs. Frist would have had his 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. And conversely, it freed up a few Dems to vote "No" on Alito....
to keep in the good graces of their voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. and we are being played for fools, left holding the bag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. True, the strategy is obvious ~ and I'm pretty sick of political strategy
Their assumption that the 'little people' can be led around like sheep, really bothers a lot of people.

Trying to paint this as anything but a disaster, is simply dishonest.

Those Senators up for reelection have lost their base, I hope they realize that. I hope they get some freeper votes. They should, the did exactly what freepers wanted them to do. But I doubt it, in fact, they will be smeared and called traitors etc. etc. only this time I for one won't be out there defending them, nor will many former supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. But he would have had to work harder at it
than he had to today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. My Reason For Wanting Filibuster Was To Give Bush A Black Eye
for tonight's SOTU.

So the fact that ultimately filibuster would've ended is mute, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. How about notions of voting with integrity, for the betterment
of the country, and all that garbage?
Oh, wait....How could I forget? :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Innocent Smith Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. No Repubs voted against cloture yesterday
And only one voted against Alito today. I am missing your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. WRONG!
If our party was HALF as organized as the GOP, that would never have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. well that's also true.
but it's generally hard to enforce party discipline when you dont have power to dole out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. right, as i've been saying, you can't read too much into individual votes
just because someone voted "no" doesn't mean they didn't want alito confirmed. knowing that he had 51 votes locked up frees up other senators to vote however the want or need to to appease constituents and/or party and/or make a deal with some other senator(s), perhaps on unrelated issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. And an argument needs to made to the voters on this
Just because a senator voted "NO" on the nomination DOES NOT mean that that senator did not support Alito. If they voted for cloture, that's as good as voting for Alito. We need to call out the panderers regardless of party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. There were no 60 votes to be found.
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 12:14 PM by ProSense
There are only 55 republicans. Three Democrats voted for Alito, total 58. Forty-one Democrats voted against alito. Even if the Republicans got the one moderate, that's only 59.


The Democrats could have tried to twist the moderate's arm too to get 42.


It would have been 41 or 42 if no meant no.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's all good and fine & it brings us back to the primary point
Our democratic representatives either:

1) Don't give a damn about their base -- everyone from environmental groups, to civil rights groups, to executive power watchdogs, to women's rights groups were united against the Alito nomination.

2) Care more about their standing with their GOP constituents, their place on the Hill, their next election hopes... than they do about our nation, Constitution and their own Congressional powers.

For if any of these things were reversed -- they gave a damn about their base, the Constitution, the balance of powers, etc. -- then their only option would have been to hold together and filibuster this nomination ('nuclear option' be damned)

We the people - the active base who runs door-to-door, works the phone banks, provides monetary support - are now left to consider if we are willing to continue to support half-hearted politicians who do not care nor listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC