|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:31 PM Original message |
WTF? Bush wants to push thru a domestic surveillance program & Bolton?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountDmoney (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. that's what I thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky Luciano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. uggggg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
23. they must humiliate him daily through shrewd political games |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jiyah (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
2. Bipartisanship lasted less than a day. What a damn creep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. Typical Bush M.O. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. yep, we never learn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. Who's surprised? "Bipartisanship" in BushSpeak means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Floogeldy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:29 AM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Um, yea. I'm so shocked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
6. Another example of what cost them this election. Arrogance again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. no surprises there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
9. That's more of the GOP's well know bipartisanship, don't ya know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. And a "domestic surveillance program" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. He no doubt wants unfettered authority to spy on Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
10. and he wants a pardon and he wants us to give nukes to India |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azurnoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
11. It's the GOP way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. That was predictable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
14. Bush bipartisan means do what we want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
15. If the Republicans still in office go along with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DianaForRussFeingold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
16. Could Be Worse! If he Has Opportunity for Another Supreme Court Judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
17. This is what the "we can't win so we won't fight" approach has gotten us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RevolutionStartsNow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
18. He's a spiteful little f*ck, isn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
19. Filibuster and trigger the Nuclear Option.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindacooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:56 AM Response to Reply #19 |
33. You bet. We can't let the chimp and neocons run roughshod over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
21. the dems can undo the worst of the fascist legislation can't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
22. he will be BITCH SLAPPED hard on this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
24. I Don't Think Reid and Pelosi Will Go For It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
25. Fillibuster... they wouldn't DARE go NUKULAR now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justice1 (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
26. He won't be seeking office in 2 years, but many in congress will be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phrogman (940 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
28. They need to tell him to sit down and shut up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
29. Just try it, Chimp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
30. In case anyone doubted what a criminal he is ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
31. This is political strategy more than anything else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:33 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. No, they really want this stuff passed and this is their last best chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
32. bush keeps giving America examples of why the GOP was voted out. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
34. Sur-PRIZE sur-PRIZE sur-PRIZE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
35. Hey, with the LieberDems Unwilling to Impeach, why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 03:17 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. C'mon Senator--who the f*ck are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greeneyedboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
37. the NYT editorial on this was pretty scathing (as it should be). typical arrogant b.s.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 03:21 AM Response to Original message |
39. I'm wondering if the Republicans in the senate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 05:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC