|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
dbt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 06:57 AM Original message |
So why didn't the Republics steal THIS election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WritingIsMyReligion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. They did But the Dems had too much support anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
18. I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. they did try to, there were a lot of dirty tricks, but the lead was too high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
everythingsxen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. Because the Republicans let the Dems win an albatross? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wake.up.america (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. 2008 is more important to them. They can blame everything on the Demos in that presidential election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:04 AM Original message |
yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
5. I think it's really good news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
6. Maybe it was better to have a Democratic win now, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
7. Oversight........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rainy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
8. Maybe it was too risky with all the EYES on them and the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:22 AM Response to Reply #8 |
19. I believe you are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sperk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
9. Maybe the media attention freaked them. THANK AAR and Lou Dobbs! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseycoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
10. It's not like they didn't try! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
11. Uh, they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseycoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:12 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
12. Operative words: "what looks like a fair election" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
14. too many people watching too closely. too many voters overwhelming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
15. They couldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
16. No central tabulator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
17. They couldn't. Bteween the Iraq war, Katrina, and the corruption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
20. It has to be close to steal it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terri S (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
21. could be too many eyes watching this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
22. I said this in the beginning of October... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
23. To be honest I think they did not count on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:33 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. I think VA was supposed to be an Allen win... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
25. IMHO, the only reason we didn't have massive fraud with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
26. In the words of a '70s poet: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
27. How do you know they didn't *TRY*? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KayLaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
28. It's not over yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
29. Don't fool yourselves -- millions of people were still disenfranchised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mugsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 08:39 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
30. Too Distributed. Due To Electoral College, Presidential/Senatorial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinkpops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 08:43 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. thas what I think too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davekriss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
32. Why? Two things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC