Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Completely unimpressed with Dean on the Today Show.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:29 PM
Original message
Completely unimpressed with Dean on the Today Show.
In the last 14 months, it seems we have forgotten almost everything we learned about 'framing the debate.' What a shame, too. Do you remember how excited all of us were about that? I sure do. However, it seems Dean does not. I guarantee you, for the course of the next few days, we will be seeing the now infamous Katie Couric/Howard Dean Abramoff-money-denial clip over, and over, and over. In fact, I'm willing to bet it will make tonight's Daily Show.

Why am I so concerned about this? When forced into a debate on Katies terms, Dean folded. He answered the question directly, without framing the issue his own way. What's up with that? Well, I honestly have no idea. Sure, her facts were so 'off' they warranted a direct and swift denial, but in that golden second, our Doctor could have used the opportunity to set her straight and clarify the situation. Instead he straight up denied. Honestly, guys, that shit looks guilty, even if it's the truth.

In closing, I would like to remind everyone NOT to play their game. This is just a heads up from the media coach, here. If any of you are ever in the position to defend Democrat credibility on this issue please, for the love of God, frame the issue, clarify the situation, make a joke, break it down for a brother, but do not simply straight up deny. The truth no longer matters here. However, coming off confident does.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Editing
Editing, smoke, mirrors... you really can't blame Dean or any other public figure for any television appearance. You never know what ended up on the cutting room floor. As you watch those shows, pay close attention to camera shots and the tone in people's voices. The untrained eye and ear can usually pick those things up if we pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think the Today Show is edited
It's pretty much live though on a slight delay for safety's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Correct. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Right. Dean has been great as of late - when the entire piece is shown.
He's been smacking them down on every point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. This was live. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. This was live. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. I don't think Dean will agree to do an edited interview.
He does not trust the network media, and rightly so. I have read that he ONLY goes on if it is live and unedited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree on the framing the debate part
We fall into that trap far too often and end up playing defense all the time. I say we hurl charges and forget about being the apologists. The hate radio pundits have made an artform of this.

As far as Dean goes , maybe he had a bad day. Generally he does a pretty good job of being on offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's guilty of not being a bullshit artist! What a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He has had a powerful rebuttal for every BS point I have seen
I am coming to appreciate him more and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. No no...he should've kicked Katie Whoric's ass ON AIR!
That's the ticket to get him noticed!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Or answered every question with "there is an on going investigation"
like jr does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. I had problems with the way he handled the Abramoff question as well.
But I thought he did an excellent job of deflecting her attacks, and completely shut her up with his recitation of what Dems stand for.

He needs to clarify his position on the "Abramoff-related" money thing, though, because the media has sold the "bipartisan" scandal thing well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I have seen him correct that point thoroughly on another show
Maybe with wolfie (can't think of his real name).
Was this before or after that interview
I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Huh?
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 03:15 PM by Clark2008
I thought "Democrats did not get one DIME from Jack Abramoff and we've got the FEC reports to prove it" was pretty damn direct.

How else would he have answered that?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. By noting that the money Dems are purported to have gotten
from "Abramoff-related" sources was donated to Dems in spite of Abramoff's lobbying, not because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. What part of "Not one Dime" don't you understand?
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 02:42 PM by Armstead
Fergit framing. In the context of a very short interview, that was a direct and clear answer to a stupid and leading question.

As long as Dean is certain of his facts, a basic "It is a Republican scandal. Not one dime of Abramoff money went to Democats" is a perfect anserfor that sitution.

Any hair splitting and follow up can come later. But that was classic and uncontestable as a sound bite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Is that what he said, I missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. You can watch or read it here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm not impressed with Katie Couric
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM by fedupinBushcountry
She was down right rude for interrupting and she out right lied about the Dems. Dean did well and you could see the anger in his eyes when this media whore out right lied.

Quit blaming Dems, put the blame on this horrible media we have.

Its the media, stupid.

Turn it off !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greentrees Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Dean does better ...
when he can just let loose ... I love to see him let it all hang out, and so does the media ... strikes fear in the heart of the rightees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. ''This is just a heads up from the media coach, here.''
you're the media coach?

did we have an election and you won and nobody told me?

fortunately i think for myself -- i thought dean did just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. well, we got the better of that exchange anyway.
transcript: http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/01/dnc_chairman_ho_9.php


This morning, DNC Chairman Howard Dean sat down with NBC's Katie Couric on the Today Show to discuss several important issues facing the American people and their priorities.

Fighting Terrorism and Protecting America

"Democrats support the idea that we ought to spy on terrorists. And, we support the idea that we need to eavesdrop from time to time. But we also believe that the President ought to obey the law. The law says that if you have an emergency reason to spy on Americans, you can go ahead and do it. But you've got to justify it with the court afterwards. We don't think this President, who has a habit of putting himself above the law, ought to be able to do this when he is spying on American."

"We all believe that we ought to be spying on Al-Qaeda, but we don't believe you ought to spy on American citizens without some kind of third party looking at this. That's what makes the difference between America and other countries like Iran, where the government can do anything they damn well please. We need to obey the law."

Supporting Our Troops

"He (President Bush) has made gross misjudgments in Iraq because he would not listen to General Shinseki and other military people who told him to do this differently. He wouldn't even listen to his own Secretary of State Colin Powell. This is a headstrong President who thinks he is above the law. We don't think that is right. We think we ought to be tough on defense. I'll tell you one thing. If we get back in power, we are going to make a real effort to go get Osama Bin Laden. We are not going to let him lollygag around for four years after the September 11th attack. And also we are going to equip our troops with the body armor that they deserve in order to fight this war. We need to do a better job on defense than this President is doing."

Democratic Priorities

"One, American jobs that will stay in America using energy independence to generate those jobs. Two, a strong national defense based on telling the truth to our citizens, our soldiers and our allies. Three, honesty and integrity to be restored to government. Four, a health care system that works for everybody just like they have 36 in other countries. And five, a strong public education system so we can have optimism and opportunity back in America."

Republican Abuse of Power

"The truth is the President and the Republicans are abusing their power in Congress. Just the other day, they stuck something in that gave HMO's 22-billion dollars of taxpayers' money. They stuck it in in the middle of the night. Nobody knew anything about it and it passed because nobody knew it was there. That is not the way to run Congress. We ought to have a real democracy in Congress where both sides get listened to and that is not the way it is right now."

Republican Culture of Corruption

"...Not one dime of Jack Abramoff's money ever went to any Democrat. We can show you the FEC reports. We would be happy to do it. There is a lot of stuff in the press that the Republican National Committee has been spinning that this is a bipartisan scandal. It is a Republican finance scandal. Not one dime of money from Jack Abramoff ever went to any Democrat, not one dime."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. How can we "frame the debate" when the media are all on the WH payroll?
The media are - with a few exceptions - all mouthpieces for Bush and the repukes.

It's enough the he was actually on the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. Media Coach using Democrat as an adjective.
Your credibility is shot right there.

DEMOCRAT IS NOT AN ADJECTIVE



Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. What? Media and credibility?
LOL

Image is the new credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Maybe you don't get it.
You deign to lecture the DNC chairman about his use of language, and yet use Democrat as an adjective like Tom DeLay? It pretty much disqualifies you from any discussion of framing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Oh, I'm pretty much all about using thier language
In a new way. That's framing, my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. No it's not. It's being framed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Is public opinion affected because
I used the word Democrat as an adjective? No, it is not. It is affected by media clips of our Chair vehemently denying false accusation which should not be dignified with public debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. So we should let them keep squealing their talking points?
Did you work on Kerry's 2004 campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Please re-read the original post for some helpful suggestions. Thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I did read it. And I don't agree. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. Nor should Republican name-calling be dignified by being parroted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. Our opinion is affected by your use of "Democrat"
Yes, we'd be much better off if Dean had been too dignified to answer Katie. Or--somebody would have been better off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. I thought he was pretty direct.
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 03:44 PM by Village Idiot
The "not one dime" was pretty good, considering he had to use it TWICE to counter her propaganda.

I really wish that at some time in the near future, one of these Dems will stand up and say "I'm going to end this debate right here, right now. You're a filthy liar. No Democrat has recieved ONE THIN DIME from Jack Abramoff. Anyone who says different is either a filthy liar or a paid propagandist. I called you a liar because I gave you the benefit of the doubt."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
35.  I would love to see them reply like that!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. This is one tough crowd to please
What do they want him to do, smack her?
(Eventhough she had it coming :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. Paul Hackett for DNC Chair !!!!
Has Dean been politically neutered since he took over as chairman?

Don't get me wrong, I sent a nice donation to the DNC as a thank you after his appointment, BUT, I feel like I'm still in the middle of the 2004 Campaign with the issues?

The only people "speaking for me" these days are not in elected offices (Hackett, Edwards, Clark and Keith Olbermann!)

Where's our voice? Preferably one with a "spine" :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Did you actually see the appearance? How can you call that neutered? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Yes, yes I did :(
Love Dean, but he needs to read more DU and study Olbermann. That's just my heartfelt opinion, I'm usually wrong :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. WTF! Hackett is running for
Senator in Ohio where he is needed and Dean is doing brilliant work as DNC Chair from the bottom up!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Can Hackett "win" a U.S. Senate seat in Ohio?
OHMIGAWD, I hope your answer is YES !
Hey, I'm in Virginia, and donate to Hackett.

Apologies, my Hackett for DNC Chair comment was really meant as a little sarcasm, as little cajones hint to the DNC.

THERE'S NO APOLOGIZING IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. Heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Sorry, if I thought the DNC
Chairman needed some cajones then I would have gotten the "Hackett for DNC chair" comment.

This op doesn't know what its talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
44. I'm completely impressed with your stack of unadulterated bullshit.
That's pure stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC