|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Us vs Them (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:29 PM Original message |
Completely unimpressed with Dean on the Today Show. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. Editing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Us vs Them (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I don't think the Today Show is edited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Correct. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tatertop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Right. Dean has been great as of late - when the entire piece is shown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. This was live. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. This was live. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LizW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. I don't think Dean will agree to do an edited interview. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. I agree on the framing the debate part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. He's guilty of not being a bullshit artist! What a shame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tatertop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. He has had a powerful rebuttal for every BS point I have seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durablend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. No no...he should've kicked Katie Whoric's ass ON AIR! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Or answered every question with "there is an on going investigation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. I had problems with the way he handled the Abramoff question as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tatertop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. I have seen him correct that point thoroughly on another show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. By noting that the money Dems are purported to have gotten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
8. What part of "Not one Dime" don't you understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tatertop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Is that what he said, I missed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
34. You can watch or read it here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fedupinBushcountry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm not impressed with Katie Couric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greentrees (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Dean does better ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
13. ''This is just a heads up from the media coach, here.'' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
14. well, we got the better of that exchange anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
20. How can we "frame the debate" when the media are all on the WH payroll? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
22. Media Coach using Democrat as an adjective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Us vs Them (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. What? Media and credibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Maybe you don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Us vs Them (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Oh, I'm pretty much all about using thier language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. No it's not. It's being framed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Us vs Them (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Is public opinion affected because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. So we should let them keep squealing their talking points? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Us vs Them (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:50 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Please re-read the original post for some helpful suggestions. Thanks n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:51 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I did read it. And I don't agree. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Nor should Republican name-calling be dignified by being parroted. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. Our opinion is affected by your use of "Democrat" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Village Idiot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
25. I thought he was pretty direct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. I would love to see them reply like that!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tatertop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. This is one tough crowd to please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
36. Paul Hackett for DNC Chair !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:14 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Did you actually see the appearance? How can you call that neutered? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:34 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Yes, yes I did :( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:15 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. WTF! Hackett is running for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:39 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Can Hackett "win" a U.S. Senate seat in Ohio? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 07:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Sorry, if I thought the DNC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-26-06 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
44. I'm completely impressed with your stack of unadulterated bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC