|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:00 AM Original message |
Poll question: If same-sex marriage is legal, what about domestic partner benefits? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
1. why the focus on couples? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Because often... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I guess I didn't make my initial point well enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:43 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. The problem is that the health benefits are not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 12:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. if we can handle all of those things... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 12:36 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. The rules of intestate inheritance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 12:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. If the current rules are set by every state... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. It's not that it is too complicated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. we're going to have to agree to disagree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. It is not an issue about the ownership of people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I should follow your example... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. The gym... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. oh my brother and I have no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. That is wonderful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 02:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. That just always seems to bizarre... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 02:19 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. There usually is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. The property issue seems easy to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. If hospitals don't have the skills... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-15-06 06:51 AM Response to Reply #33 |
46. I ment skills to authenticate the documentation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. I am still mulling over the corporation on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Well, you can just keep the number of shares |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 07:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. From what you have said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. two questions, two answers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. obviously, that would be best. But, gotta go one step at a time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think domestic partnership should be open to all couples who desire it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HarukaTheTrophyWife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yeah, NJ allows that, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Yep, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
4. Whatever is available to a hetero couple... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Your post really had nothing to do with the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Well, maybe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:32 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. But you start laying into arguments why homosexual couples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:49 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Where... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Then perhaps it was just how your original post was phrased |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 12:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. No offense taken... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 12:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. But what stops the penalties of marrige from being applied to partnerships |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 12:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. There is no way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vulture (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. This works out pretty well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. This is excellent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 02:19 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. careful now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
14. That is what will be on the ballot here in Wisconsin next month. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moose65 (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 12:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. many of the amendments have been worded that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Not Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
15. My former company provided "two-person" coverage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 08:05 PM Response to Reply #15 |
44. This is the sanest idea I've seen yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
17. Other: There should be no such thing as "legal marriage" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 02:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
41. So people who cannot afford lawyers should not have marital protections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-14-06 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
45. Why should health insurance coverage be limited to SEXUAL partners? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC