Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In case anyone missed it: Bush pardons meth cook

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:43 PM
Original message
In case anyone missed it: Bush pardons meth cook
From bigtree's thread earlier:

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=70815

Among Bush's recent pardons:

Victoria Diane Frost, Medina, Ohio

Offense: Conspiracy to possess and distribute L-Ephedrine Hydrochloride, 21 U.S.C. Section 846

Date: April 25, 1994; Western District of New York; three years probation, including six months' home confinement; $3,000 fine


Hey, I'm more anti-drug-war than anyone... But pardoning meth cooks is not going to play well in rural America. Besides, I like the meme that Bushco is soft on meth because they only want to prosecute Tommy Chong and medical marijuana patients. So, those who agree with me--remember the name of Victoria Diane Frost of Medina, Ohio.

Would appreciate anyone who knows anything else about her case, which is considerably more recent than most of the other pardons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Everyone On That List Served Their Time, Including The Meth Cook.
What's the big deal here? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd like to see how this develops, remember the last time
a democrat was pummeled for sayin he would pardon someone or did he pardon someone and it was used against him by repugs? Anyway I'd like to see more info on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The big deal:
The whole GOP should be savaged to death for their hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Only repiglicans get pardoned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. ephedrine is not meth
just thought you might like to know that

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Meth cooking is the basis of its criminality. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. ephedrine was a common and legal drug until very recently
Edited on Wed Aug-16-06 08:52 PM by pitohui
it was made illegal because some numbnuts sports figure went out in the hot sun and died and they blamed the ephedrine

if it wasn't used for meth cooking when it was legal, abundant, and the basis for every MLM scheme with the word "herb" in it around then you are going to have to excuse my skepticism

you are thinking of the chemical pseudo ephedrine, most likely

perhaps prosecutors were too and this is the basis for the pardon

this person very well prob. never should have been jailed for anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yep, it was legal in 1994
Edited on Wed Aug-16-06 08:57 PM by Jed Dilligan
unless you were using it to cook meth

On edit: I think you're confusing ephedrine and ephedra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I wish I had some meth.
It's the old hippie's answer to "Lose weight! Feel great!" Six or eight months down the road you might look and feel like shit, but it's a helluva ride while it lasts. :hippie:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. since you seem to know whereof you speak...
What do you think, can ephedrine be a meth component? Is it likely that someone federally prosecuted for it in '94 was involved in cooking meth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Never having been involved in the manufacturing end,
I cannot speak from first hand meth chemist knowledge. I believe however that typical street meth often contains substances that are not actually methamphetamine but that have similar psychoactive properties. Ephedrine is a likely ingredient in such products. Quality product; i.e. true methamphetamine, is surely available from "reliable" sources. It should be noted that one of the many hazards of being a "rip-off" dealer; i.e. one who sells "meth" that isn't really meth or is so cut down as to be considered substandard, is that it's rather easy to get shot. Of course, I'm old now. I've been away from all that stuff for quite awhile. ;-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. would that his pardons were his worst crime
Then i might care. AS it sounds, he's given a few folks a second chance who were screwed
by the evil drugs war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well, if we want rural districts at all,
the GOP being soft on meth is a good theme to hammer. Even if we don't plan to do anything differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Oh. Come. ON! He didn't release 100 drug criminals. Just his old dealer.
WHy even RUN for Prez if you can't pardon your own dang dealer? Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. 100 is a statistic, 1 (cf. Willie Horton)
is political gold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Supply side drugenomics
The problem there is like saying we'll support suppply side economics
now because people don't understand anything else but trickle-down,
so why shake the cage?

If you want to show them being soft on crime, then make that victem
crime and show how they're behind thousands of rapes in afganistan
and occupied territories *they* are responsible for.

We must root out the bad drugs war ideology root and branch, and
breaking this for "meth" does no truth-service to anyone, and
selling out has not worked to overturn the drugs stupidity in my lifetime,
why will it suddenly work?

Probably, given the reality of drugs, the person taking this meth who
bush has pardoned, was abused as a child, experienced childhood trauma
that ripples in to the adult life as a drugs problem, and like all
addictions, the most suffering person is at ground zero.

I won't jump on the bankwagon to screw someone for suffering... never,
not for any political expediency. Bush is a loathsome critter,
but i wouldna take it out on some poor bloke, no, rather mr. creedy
must go down with his network of thugs, and since they *are* war
incarnate, we've much larger fish to fry and need make this
referendum only about the war, americans are sick of being lied to,
even stupid ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Well, dream on
Glad to see idealism is alive and well on DU.

I want to see this exploited for political points, and I disagree with you about the "poor bloke" in this case. Abused or not, she is probably a rich person with high-up Republican connections who got her a slap-on-the-wrist sentence for a major federal crime, and now this pardon.

Besides, it is true that the GOP has de-prioritized meth to start a new war on marijuana. People who live near meth production, which not only breeds violent crime but does serious environmental damage, will not be thrilled by this when we get the news out to them. The media hasn't so far. One poster-child is all we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Towns & counties dont' WANT to bust meth labs:
the cleanup costs are astronomical...they're like mini-superfund sites. Bushonomics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Jesus, people-concentrate....
google the people pardoned and pin the tail on the right wing ties....no one was pardoned "free" if you catch my drift.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Of course
But the public doesn't want to hear about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. Soft on Meth ?
Or soft FOR meth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. What was the reasoning behind any of these pardons? Did they contribute
to the Republican Party and now they want to make sure they have voting rights in Repug-controlled states which don't let fellons vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. Gannon was moonlighting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC