President Bush has issued hundreds of signing statements invoking his right to interpret or ignore laws on everything from whistle-blower protections to how Congress oversees the Patriot Act.
By Laurie Kellman, The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — A bill becomes the rule of the land when Congress passes it and the president signs it into law, right?
Not necessarily, according to the White House. A law is not binding when a president issues a separate statement saying he reserves the right to revise, interpret or disregard it on national security and constitutional grounds.
That's the argument a Bush administration official is expected to make Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who has demanded a hearing on a practice he considers an example of the administration's abuse of power.
"It's a challenge to the plain language of the Constitution," Specter said in an interview with The Associated Press. "I'm interested to hear from the administration just what research they've done to lead them to the conclusion that they can cherry-pick."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-06-27-bush-signing-statements_x.htm