Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Photo ID For Voting Fails

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:09 AM
Original message
National Photo ID For Voting Fails

May 24, 2006
National Photo ID For Voting Fails
Per Electionline.org:

This morning, the U.S. Senate conducted two roll call votes related to the voter ID amendment (SA 4085) proposed by Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky:

The first vote -- a motion to table the amendment -- failed, 49-48. A record of the roll call vote is here. On the second vote, the Senate invoked cloture (i.e.. agreed to limit debate) on the underlying immigration bill (S. 2611). The vote was 73-25 and the roll call is here. As a result of cloture, the McConnell amendment falls as a non-germane amendment to the bill.

more at:
http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2006/05/naitonal_photo.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. close call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. thanks nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why did someone else post otherwise
I believe this one cause I want to believe it and I hope it is so.....:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Think someone posted the failure to table the amendment vote earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ok ---- Thanks alot
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good news!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Vote this up, this is Great News.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. 60 NO votes were required to keep the
Amendment from being tabled (killed). The Pukes did not get their 60 votes and the amendment failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. 60 Was for Cloture. We Actually Filibustered This One
:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. That is FANTASTIC News!!!! Thank you so much for posting this!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. finally some good news out of Washington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kinda interesting that the GOP was using this an issue against Clinton
- no national id card, etc. - & claiming that if Clinton won the election he would put an id card in place

& now most of them are all for it. What a bunch of hypocrates!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Does anybody have a second source for this??
I haven't been able to find anything except this link
and there is another thread that says the complete opposite!
Help! please?? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC