Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

World Prison Population List

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:07 PM
Original message
World Prison Population List
-> Over 9 million people are held in penal institutions
throughout the world, mostly as pre-trial detainees
(remand prisoners) or having been convicted
and sentenced. Almost half of these are in the
United States (2.09m), China (1.55m plus pretrial
detainees and prisoners in ‘administrative
detention’) or Russia (0.76m).

-> The United States has the highest prison
population rate in the world, some 714 per 100,000
of the national population, followed by Belarus,
Bermuda and Russia (all 532), Palau (523), U.S.
Virgin Islands (490), Turkmenistan (489), Cuba
(487), Suriname (437), Cayman Islands (429), Belize
(420), Ukraine (417), Maldive Islands (416), St Kitts
and Nevis (415), South Africa (413) and Bahamas
(410).

Full PDF including tables: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/rel/icps/world-prison-population-list-2005.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. We're Number 1! We're Number1!
Now...doesn't everyone feel safer now?

On a serious note:
This is really damned sad. We have got to be the least creative post-industrialized Democracy in the world when it comes to dealing with law enforcement issues.
At the rate we're going, we'll have half our population in prisons by 2020. No wonder so many corporations want to go to private prisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Half the population in prison
Half retired... Who's gonna be supporting the population? Great future! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That won't be an issue
The prison systems in the past have handled everything from our telemarketing to customer service at times till the idea of them having our credit card numbers finally struck someone as a bad idea. It's mostly done State by State so it's not even across the country, to get a taste of how yours is using its prison labor check the following.

In Texas they are a free labor force that makes furniture among other things at an almost giveaway rate for select officials. It's free labor, if need be they'll make it pay.

http://www.prisonactivist.org/prison-labor/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Retired???
That's soooo 20th Century.
Don't you know? We're going back to the pre-19th Century of retirement. If you have a family to support you or money you can retire. Otherwise, you work til you drop dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. USA USA USA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. for some reason I can't get on the link but just from reading your
post I would have to say it's China with the largest numbers, including their forced labor camps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Try this one
The site he linked is good but I'm fairly sure it's sourced from this one in the first place, so you might try it directly.

http://www.prisonstudies.org/

For current stats just select "World Prison Brief" then "Highest to Lowest Rates".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Thanks, it worked. I still think it's not picking up millions of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. On edit: Never mind. I get it. nt
Edited on Mon May-22-06 11:38 PM by Miss Chybil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexodin Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why does it say:
"Over 9 million people are held in penal institutions throughout the world......"

"Almost half of these are in the United States (2.09m)"

2.09 is almost half of 9? Am I missing something?

So we offshore our jobs and in-source our jobs and we must also compete with prison slave labor.

You know with a roof over head and meals prison looks like a better deal than minimum wage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's the commas, period!
Almost half of these are in the
United States (2.09m), China (1.55m plus pretrial
detainees and prisoners in ‘administrative
detention’) or Russia (0.76m).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The comma :)
You just missed the comma, it's not half in just the US but half between the few listed nations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That got me too for a minute.
It's almost half are in the U.S., China, and Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Got me too!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexodin Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ok thanks I knew I was missing something.
There was another thread on this subject that reported a figure of 1 in 135 US residents behind bars. I think the operative word is "residents". How many of these residents are under 18? I suspect the figure is more alarming than 1 in 135.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. You're right
Prisoners in transport are often not counted, our military and indian reservation prisoners generally aren't counted and juveniles are never included in most incarceration statistics.

The count in total, or as close as I've come to it, was well over 2.2 million a few years ago rather than nearing it today. You can reference that at point #10 on the following page, the stats there are a couple of years old though so it won't match with more current ones but it'll give you a taste of what's left out of them. http://drugwarfacts.org/prison.htm

The most current numbers I'm aware of don't include juvies, but the best single source I know of for research on most of the system is the following. http://www.prisonpolicy.org/ The stats for the US now is 724 inmates per 100,000, that'll be updated again shortly since it's about that time of year. 714 was the year before that.

If anyone doubts any of the stats and such in these types of threads, ask some cops about it. They've got a short video that's interesting linked from the main page. It's real enough. http://leap.cc/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Slight clarification
Edited on Tue May-23-06 10:45 AM by Asgaya Dihi
It didn't occur to me till I just read it that someone might misunderstand what I said above. The number 714 I assume was a typo of 724 in the first post which our current stat. I *should* have said we passed that last year, not that was last year. Last years stat was 702, the year before 686.

Sorry for any confusion, don't want any wrong impressions out there. We've got enough already.

Edit: finally got the link in the op to work, both numbers are right. The place I normally source at goes with June statistics, this document went with December stats which was half way between the ones I'm used to. Makes more sense now ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. Canada 116 per 100,000. Twice as high as the Netherlands but...


not bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. I'm sure that as the Chinese become richer and thus better able to...
afford incarceration, their rates will rise too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexodin Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Perhaps.
If Walmart wants more American flags China may have to jail more dissidents to keep up with the demand for flag making labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. they hate us for our freedom
er....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bj2110 Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. Now, how many of the 714 per 100,000 are in prison on drug charges?
I bet it's over 500.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Very good point...
I'd like to see the data broken down by crime as well... I bet drug charges are at the top (I mean, simple possession)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Not directly
It depends on the system, Federal or State, and also some on sex. In the Federal system over 50% overall are there directly related to drug charges and in the State systems it's between 20-25%. Women are more prone to end up incarcerated for drugs than men though they have much lower overall rates and race makes a pretty big difference as well. A few stats on the system at the following.

http://www.drugwarfacts.org/prison.htm

The numbers there related to drugs are much higher than the direct drug convictions though, the dealer who is in for killing to protect his corner doesn't count as drug related, but it is. The addict who goes in for robbery to support a habit doesn't count but is, and the same could be said for many of our outright violent criminals. You might go in a scared kid who just bought a bag on the wrong corner, but after five years or so inside you're likely to come out mean and knowing how to hurt people, as well as angry enough to be inclined to do so. Lock someone up with animals and treat them like an animal and we just create new animals, then release them better trained to hurt people.

The prison and jail system grew by 6 times since 1972, our population only a fraction of that. I'd credit most of the growth over the rate of population growth to the drug war myself. Wasn't any other reason for that growth that I can find, and we now imprison our own at a rate 5-8 times that of nations similar to us such as Britain, France and Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC