|
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 06:38 PM by Eloriel
I haven't looked at the link yet, but I will.
When I was getting married the 2nd time, I told my husband that "We're both adults, we've both been taking care of our own laundry and other life maintenance tasks, so that's exactly the way I expect things to continue once we're married."
He's been very good at not seeing/expecting "domestic help" type roles from me, but I'm basically retired these days and he's definitely NOT, so really a reasonable and fair division of labor means that while there's a LOT of cleaning and picking up after our own selves we both do, a very good bit of the life maintenance tasks falls to me (tho NOT laundry!!). He still cooks now and then (once or twice a week, as a rule), bakes when HE wants baked goods (they're not on my diet), does most of the grocery shopping while he's out anyway, ferries things to the dry cleaners and does a number of other errands, and does most of the lawn upkeep (tho any "gardening" I want done -- flower, vegetable, herb -- is mostly my responsibility if I want any done at all).
If I brought in any money we could hire out more of the "life maintenance tasks," and that would be wonderful, but it's not in the cards.
Now, after all that diversion, what's synchronous about this is that I was thinking to myself earlier today about how things were when I was growing up in the 1950s and pre-2nd Wave Feminism 60s. There was a time when women typically did all the clothes-buying for their husbands, and their laundry too, of course. I grew up in such a household where my mother had a job off and on (when needed) and took care of everything else as well -- cooking, canning, cleaning, laundry, IRONING, family clothes buying, home decorating, etc., etc., etc. My GAWD (God, A Woman Deity), what a sense of superiority you can grow for yourself from being on the receiving end of that reality alone: your very own domestic servant, so you never have to clean house, never have to do your own laundry, never have to cook for yourself!!! Think about it for a while and no woman who's honest about it would disagree with that famous line (from Gloria Steinem, I believe it was): I need a wife.
Really, "wife" had a status of unpaid domestic help -- not unlike butler or manservant. As wife, you got sex (big deal), "his name" (considered something of value in itself in some circumstances), economic necessities taken care of (presumably), children (a mixed blessing), and if you're lucky an inheritance -- all that instead of a paycheck.
I'm thinking a paycheck might be a better deal.
The labor women contribute to this world would probably be THE biggest item in GDP if it were taken into account, which it's not.
Another thing I was thinking to myself a few days ago: the Women's Movement gave me a life. I am SO utterly constitutionally unsuited to have been either a "homemaker" or "stay-at-home mome" or a teacher, secretary, stewardess, nurse, etc. that it's not even funny and in fact, the mere thought of living a life of only those choices drives me nearly bonkers. I can't IMAGINE what my life would have been like had the Women's Movement not come along just in time to -- as I said, GIVE me a life, and a chance to have one.
Edit: One more thought, also from Steinem I am pretty sure (paraphrased tho): When men talk about "helping with the housework," or childcare, etc., that's just a higher level of sexism. IOW: who is it who is still RESPONSIBLE for it? Men need to not just "help" with these life maintenance tasks, but be partially responsible for them as well.
|