Did 308,000 Cancelled Ohio Voter Registrations Put Bush Back In the White

[Dr Ron]

Did 308,000 Cancelled Ohio Voter Registrations Put Bush Back In the White House?

This is from a Marxist site which I stumbled upon in a RSS feed for Kerry stories and I have no idea how credible it is, but it is an interesting article on Ohio:

http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/2890/1/152/

[fedupinBushcountry]

1. I read it

and it just makes me sick how these bastards cheated. If we don't fix it, it will happen again. I think they also stole Senate seats too. The more I think about it, the sicker I get.

Everyone complains about how this one and that one haven't done a thing to fix things. Well it takes we the people to change things, and it has to happen state to state. The media should be all over this and they sit silent, how many times do we have to go through this to wake people up.

[ProSense]

2. There has been a lot of election fraud stories lately. This is from

http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2006/1832

This is on DU's home page:

Florida newspaper finds thousands of mysterious entries in voter database

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=415718&mesg_id=415718


Where did Bush get his money?

The universe of donors is fluid and changes markedly from election to election. One of the findings most surprising to the authors of the study was that only 31 percent who gave the maximum, $1,000, to Bush in 2000, including those who made non-Internet donations, contributed in 2004.

http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/charlotte/news/14027552.htm?source=rss&channel=charlotte_news

[ginnyinWI]

3. I think it's to be expected--the fraud stories

With * ratings as low as they are, these stories are now "allowed" into the media. Now they seem to be wanted, as people try to figure out what happened--and why * may not deserve to be in the WH after all. They are experiencing cognitive dissonance!

The media seems to take its cues from poll ratings of the president, rather than trying to report the FACTS. But in turn, what the media presents is largely responsible for poll ratings! Something is wrong with this picture. When they constantly try to be on the "right side" of the story, they do us all a great disservice. Many people take the media as straight shooting facts presenters and don't see the bias. But I wouldn't want them to do this even if we had a Dem in the WH. It gives the president a huge pass, and that is bad for the country.

[ProSense]

4. That's the irony.

The MSM isn't kind to Democrats when they control the WH. It's part finger in the wind to keep viewers and part GOP shill. Whenever MSM can get away with it, the spin is GOP.