Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, Obama could be a Vaccine Woo?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 05:06 AM
Original message
So, Obama could be a Vaccine Woo?
I didn't know that.

:banghead:

When it comes to science, Barack Obama is no better than many of us. Today he joins the list of shame of those in public life who made scientifically unsupportable statements in 2008.

- snip -

Mr Obama and John McCain blundered into the MMR vaccine row during their presidential campaigns. "We've seen just a skyrocketing autism rate," said President-elect Obama. "Some people are suspicious that it's connected to the vaccines. This person included. The science right now is inconclusive, but we have to research it," he said.

His words were echoed by Mr McCain. "It's indisputable that is on the rise among children, the question is what's causing it," he said. "There's strong evidence that indicates it's got to do with a preservative in the vaccines."

Exhaustive research has failed to substantiate any link to vaccines or any preservatives. The rise in autism is thought to be due to an increased awareness of the condition.

- snip -


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientific-illiteracy-all-the-rage-among-the-glitterati-1212406.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hadn't heard this either.
However, since he didn't nominate RFK, jr and has appointed a whole lot of very smart scientific types, he may have learned better by now especially since once again its MMR they mentioned which doesn't have thimerosol. Not surprised that McCain didn't know that, but at least Obama didn't say that.
Somehow, I got the feeling, since Obama makes a point of being aware of things that when RFK,jr was being floated around as a possible candidate he got educated.
We'll see. I'd be more worried if this came out of Daschles mouth at this point since he is to be head of HHS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That was my impression as well
I'm hopeful that his choices since then re: science are better representative of his thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
skepticscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not so good, I know
but hopefully it was just an issue that Obama was not fully informed on. He seems like the kind of person who will understand the evidence against vaccines causing autism once it's laid out for him clearly. And the notion of RFK Jr (one the biggest vaccine woos of all) being made head of the EPA seems to have faded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. When I heard that, I knew he'd been talking to RFK, Jr.
As much as I generally respect that family, I wish that particular member would stick to his own field, the law. He sucks at medicine.

Unfortunately, his famous name makes people who don't know any better think he's some sort of expert.

I sincerely hope Obama listens to people who are actually in the field. The signs are good that he will--he's appointing scientists and academics to agencies to replace religious ideologues.

We'll have to wait and see whether reason prevails over belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Being suspicious and being a "true believer" are two different things

I don't expect that Barack Obama is a walking encyclopedia of medical research findings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. When he said "this person included", I believe he was...
referring to the individual that asked the question - not referring to himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Think about when he said that.
He was in the middle of a campaign. Did you expect him to say that he believes that the vaccine-autism link is crazy woowoo shit?

He was trying to find something to say that wouldn't piss anyone off. That's what you do in a campaign--try not to piss anyone off. And I thought he did a pretty good job of it.

You've probably heard the same format a thousand times.

I know you're concerned.
I'm concerned too.
We'll look into it.


Every politician has to use it sometimes. But it is as hollow as a drum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Pet issues are a minefield

It's why the 9/11 Truthers see Ron Paul as "one of their own", despite his later comical attempts to extricate himself from earlier friendly-sounding noises he made towards them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC