Is this link appropriate as the foundation for a thread related to Women's Rights?

[Boojatta]

Poll question: Is this link appropriate as the foundation for a thread related to Women's Rights?

Equal Pay for Women? Not Til 2050, By Kate Lorenz

http://www.careerbuilder.com/Article/CB-709-Getting-Ahead-Equal-Pay-for-Women-Not-Til-2050/?ArticleID=709&cbRecursionCnt=1&cbsid=381b34dc555e4ba1be0003b02ce6fcc4-308063722-KG-5

[Brickbat]

1. Other: bad link.

[Boojatta]

3. Maybe it can't handle the traffic right now. The webpage at the link displayed for me.

Here's the text that a search engine showed before I decided to display the webpage:

Equal Pay for Women? Not Til 2050

"Equal Pay for Women? Not Til 2050 - Get Career Advice from the experts at ... The pay gap appears in all occupations, including those with severe shortages ..."
www.careerbuilder.com/Article/CB-709-Getting-Ahead-Equal-Pay-for-Women-Not-Til-2050/

[Brickbat]

2. The information itself can be useful. The "who says women are never satisfied?" is just stupid and

it's possible to ignore that to talk about the other information.

[ZombieHorde]

4. Two of the headers in the article begin with the word "it" or "it's".

I have a pet peeve against headers and sentences which begin with the word "it" or "it's".

"It Varies By Race" = Lame :-(

Followed by...

"The pay gap differs by race" = Clear :-)

"It's Wider Among Professionals" = Lame :-(

Not followed by...

"The pay gap is wider among professionals" = Clear :-)