Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The mormon church is a terrorist organization.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:09 AM
Original message
The mormon church is a terrorist organization.
Sound like an exaggerated statement?

Consider mormon history.

on 09/11/1857 (ironic date, eh?) Mormons committed the worst terrorist act on American soil, until the Oklahoma City bombing. Google Mountain Meadows Massacre if you don't believe me.

Brigham Young preached death for miscegenation, and actually had young men castrated for offenses against the church. The Danites (or Avenging Angels as they are sometimes known) would track down and kill apostatsizing church members, or those who revealed less-than-flattering details of the underbelly of mormonism.

It wasn't until 1978 - when, bowing to federal government pressure - that a Mormon "prophet" had a revelation that black male members should receive the priesthood in their church.

One recent prophet of the mormon church - Ezra Taft Benson - was Secretary of Agriculture for Eisenhower and considered him "soft on communism". Benson was a member of the John Birch Society, and has been quoted as having said, "It is impossible to be both a good Democrat and a good Mormon".

The history of mormonism is one of violent extremism.

Their all-out support of Proposition 8 is just further demonstration of that fact. Let's spread the word about what bigoted, racist, homophobic a-holes this church and its members really are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Like Al Capone...getting them on tax charges would be more efficient
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. While I hesitate to brand every Morman
the ones who claim to horrified at how their "church" has used and abused the process (this time anyway) I do not see why they should continue to reap tax benifits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. My wife and I used to be mormons...
She was raised in it, and I converted to marry her.

Thankfully, we learned about that "church"'s history several years ago, and left it and never looked back.

So, yes, I'm not painting all mormons with the same brush, as many of them are good people. But the ignorance and cognitive dissonance among the membership is truly astounding. They believe everything their "leaders" tell them, because they're told that's what it means to be a good mormon.

But far more frequently nowadays, being a good mormon and being a good person are very much at odds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I just gotta ask...
what is up with the "holy underwear"? And grats on getting out of that mess :) (pun intended LOL!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Temple garments, they call them. "Garments" for short.
NEVER ever supposed to remove them, even to bathe (they partially remove them to bathe but always keep contact with them. Not sure how the heck Mormons shower without soaking their garments........

Not supposed to remove them for sex, either. How romantic (they are like long johns with separate top and bottom, are white, and extend past knee and elbow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. so many religions turn to self-hate
as expressions of "faith". Self-flagellation adn wearing hair-shirts. That always made me wonder why people were willing to believe that the god who supposedly made them hated the bodies he supposedly gave us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Only the true mormon extremists never remove them for bathing, sex, etc.
Not so many of that sort around anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gwendolyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. That just seems so unhealthy. I'm thinking fungal infections. Yuck. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
34. We lived in Salt Lake City and my mom told this:
My mom and dad were Catholics. Dad was transferred to Utah. My mom saw the woman next door hanging out her wash and she said that she was shocked that they couldn't afford new underwear since their's was so worn that it had big holes in it. She laughed herself sick when she found out about it being their holy underwear instead of their holey underwear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. They used to be god
Now they are just holey.



Badaboom ching!Thank you very much.Next show is at 10 and don't forget to tip your waitress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aska Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
40. silly story
With silly stories like yours floating around the net it's no wonder that it's faddish to pick on the "Mormons". Maybe it's time for Mormons to start speaking up for the truth about themselves in forums such as this one??

Active temple worthy Mormons wear white "garments" beneath their street clothes to remind them of sacred covenants they made with God. That's similar to articles of clothing worn by orthodox Jews and some other religious groups.

Today's garments are not like long johns and they do not extend past or even to the elbow. Mormons remove their garments and wash them the same as everyone else treats their underwear. They swim in ordinary swimsuits and play sports without wearing garments. And, sorry to burst your bubble, Mormons shower naked, just like everybody else. (Except of course for a shower cap to keep their horns dry.)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
aska Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Is that a threat?
Those are harsh words, please clarify. Is your statement intended to be a threat to me or my family or to any other individual or group?

I'm new here, does this person have immunity from board moderation, or is this kind of statement acceptable on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. No, it's not a threat. But you do not belong on this message board.
You are not a Progressive.

So, save all of us some time and just go fuck off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. Oh you're just regular folks darnit!
Except the bigotry and the bullshit.

The "keep your kids away from non-Mormon's" kids.

The insular community to the point where it's actually anti-social yet civil at the same time...kudos for that.

The constant Republican voting.

The racist up until the 70s and constantly sexist bullshit.

The baptizing folks who you have no goddamn right to baptize.

Oh darnit! You're just regular folks!!!

Yeah...horns huh...I knew a Jewish girl who said that Mormons seemed to think she had them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. What is a "temple-worthy Mormon?"
And if only temple-worthy Mormons are allowed in the temples, how did those godless queers get close enough to vandalize one of your sacred temples?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. 1) has paid their tithe, 2) kissed the right asses, and 3) hates gays
They've gotten rid of 4) hates blacks and 5) loves to marry pre pubescent girls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
41. couple of corrections
We used to call them 'garmies' for short. And while some did not take them off to bathe or have sex, I don't remember that being the norm. I do not remember the sleeves extended to the elbows. More closely described as 'cap' sleeves for women, and about the lenth of a t-shirt for men. I left the cult about 20 years ago, and I don't think garmies have changed to cover more of the body since I left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. As with everything else in mormonism, it's a "borrowed" concept.
It's got masonic symbols on it, and nowadays it's touted as being a "protection" for the member against the evils of the world, and a reminder of one's temple covenants.

The reality behind it is that the super-secret magic Jesus jammies were once a recognition sign for those who practiced polygamy. See, the early mormon church denied that it practiced polygamy for some time, and even concealed that fact from much of its membership until they migrated out to Utah. The undies were the "pass key" to the celestial swingers club, basically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. heh I still have my Playboy Club card (from long ago)
I MUCH prefer that :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
55. Everyone who isn't Mormon knows Joseph Smith stole the symbols and rituals from the Masonic Lodge.
But every Mormon I've ever attempted to discuss the history of LDS with has either been completely ignorant about it, or didn't want to hear about it. They're allergic to history and knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. self-delete duplicate post
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 11:31 AM by arbusto_baboso
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoBear Donating Member (781 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, as Jon Stewart said,
who better to defend the idea of marriage being "one man and one woman" than a church founded on polygamy???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. I heard that they started letting black people join only because...
... otherwise Brigham Young University's basketball team wouldn't be allowed to compete in the NCAA or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I always wondered what prompted that. It figures.
Plus, it meant fresh meat for their missionaries and tithing system. The Mormon church is ALL ABOUT MONEY AND POWER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. They say that being Black is The Mark of Cain, and if a Black Person becomes a Mormon...
... their skin will lighten and turn white as they progress toward Salvation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. Remember the Lamanite immersion program?
I think it was David o McKay (may have been a different prophet) that swore up and down the lamanites were getting whiter when the kids were farmed out to white families to be raised. Of course that was right before they changed the BoM from "White and delightsome" to "pure and delightsome".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Tell me about it. My g-g-g-grandfather, William Adams Hickman,
wes head of the Danites, the "law enforcement arm" of the early Mormon church. Blood atonement was strictly enforced.

There is at least one other DUer who is descended from Hickman, lol. He was into that polygamy thing and has MANY descendants. We are legion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curse of greyface Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. No it is a church with some whackjobs... A church that supported something you disagree with.
Brigham Young preached death for miscegenation... What a surprise cause that was so popular in the mid 1800's.

Is the Morman Church Racist and Homophobic... yes The Mainstream Black Churches are also Homophobic I wonder why you don't attack them. Or the Catholics or the Orthodox Jews or the Muslims or the Chinese or the dozens of other groups that came out in favor or Prop 8

Heck why not attack all the Male Homosexuals who couldn't be bothered to vote. (Lesbians were the force behind no)

The Mormon church helped fund Yes on 8 I get that... But seriously making them the scapegoat ignores the people that voted against your interest or didn't bother to vote at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. You miss the point entirely.
Mormons provied anywhere between 47 and 70% of the funding for Yes on 8, yet mormons only consist of about 2% of the population of California, if that.

Catholics, by comparison, didn't donate nearly that much, except for the Opus Dei/Knights of Columbus nutjobs.

And as to what point YOU are trying to make, you're utterly failing to make one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Spending money on Proposal 8 is bigoted, but it isn't terrorism
It wasn't physically violent. They're bigots, and they're a political organization (and should be paying taxes because of that), but that wasn't an act of terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Wasn't it?
Isn't attacking someone's basic civil rights a terrorist act?

I'd be very interested in hearing your rationale if you disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Physically provoking terror is terroism
Terrorism means making someone afraid of their physical safety. Obviously there are terrorist bigots, and therefore we have hate crime laws. But voting, and trying to get other people to vote a certain way, is not terrorism because it is not a threat of physical violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. You have a very narrow view of what constitutes terrorism.
Especially since terrorism means the use of terror to achieve one's ends. Do you honestly think that's not what happened here?

And do you think the Yes on 8 campaign will NOT lead to even more gay bashing? I guarantee you that it will, so it will even fulfil YOUR narrow criteria of terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. No, I understand the definiton of terrorism
There are really bad things that people do that aren't "terrorism". No, they didn't use terror - the threat that someone would be physically hurt - to achieve their means. They used bigotry and hate.

It might lead to more gay bashing - but that's speculation and not a direct link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curse of greyface Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. That is the point I am making. The Mormons didn't vote in large numbers.
They funded it. I get that. But they didn't vote. Over the top demonetizing of them doesn't solve the basic problem. Reaching out to the majority of Californians that either voted to take away our rights or were too self involved or lazy to protect their own rights.

Where was the funding for NO. How many gay couples spent more on their wedding flowers than donated to the cause? How many volunteered to stand outside black churches on Sunday and hand out vote no on 8 literature?

Blaming the Mormons is a cop out.

The true blame belongs to the majority of Californians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. They are at the least a political organization that should therefore be taxed
And I don't believe that about all churches, but I do believe it about churches that tell people how to vote, which includes the Catholic church. Remember when they were telling people they had to vote in a certain way or they couldn't receive communion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. And let's not forget those filthy Joos.
Leviticus was a Joo, weren't he?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Oh, because I'm not tolerant of institutional intolerance, now I'M the hater???
Please. Keep your delusions to yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I wouldn't use the word "hater."
It's much too mild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
25. tell it to Harry Reid
nice that you had to go back to 1857 for an actual act of violence and that you want to call them bigots while you express prejudice against an entire group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. What has Harry Reid done for the GLBT community?
Has he been instrumental in passing federal protections for us? Has he managed to get ENDA passed? Has he dumped DOMA?

Don't imply that I have to respect the "religious" beliefs of anyone who CHOOSES to belong to an organization which actively campaigns against the constitutional rights of other Americans. Reid is a member of that church by CHOICE. I have yet to see or hear one public statement from him or his office about his church's continuing role in funding these amendments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I said that group prejudice is bigotry
I think that's true even if people choose to join a group. (Clearly it is not true of groups like the KKK or neo-nazi groups whose primary purpose is terrorism and bigotry, but I think groups like the Mormon church, the Catholic church, the Republican party, etc. have different and more complicated primary purposes.)

I don't think I implied that any beliefs have to be respected. What I think is kinda ironic is how there seems to be a "with us or against us" black and white mentality. There is no gray apparently. Any person or organization which is against the GLBT community is 1000% fu$%ing Evil. I saw the Mormon church supply pallets of supplies for flood relief after Osawatomie was flooded (I also realized that they buttered their own bread because I think they bought the supplies from the Mormon-owned Albertsons stores). So I would make the case that they do SOME good. Just as I would make the case that Reid has done some good. You seem to imply that people who are not for the GLBT community aren't worth a tanj either. Even if Reid has not done anything against the GLBT community, he is still an a$$hole because he has not done anything for the GLBT community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. who the fuck cares about their P.R. campaigns to look good.,
Edited on Tue Nov-11-08 09:37 AM by jonnyblitz
some of you people will bend over backwards to stick up for groups that hate just because they are a religion or because some clueless DEM leader or some nice person you know who likes puppies is a member. sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aska Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #25
47. good point
I realize that I'm coming into this thread late but it's an extremely serious charge from my point of view to label a church and its USA members "terrorists", especially in this day when our nation is at war against real terrorists who do everything they can to kill American citizens.

I agree with your comment about the person who opened this highly offensive thread: "nice that you had to go back to 1857 for an actual act of violence and that you want to call them bigots while you express prejudice against an entire group."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
32. They are, and they should lose their charitable status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. I don't believe that they are terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
36. The Mormons are having problems retaining new converts.
Low LDS Convert Retention Rate
The Growth of the Mormon Church Now Relies on People Born into Faith

http://mormonism.suite101.com/article.cfm/low_lds_convert_retention_rate

Although the number of baptisms reported has remained fairly steady, most people baptized into the Mormon faith become inactive shortly after joining the church.

..............

The convert retention rate for first generation Mormons is zero percent, according to a Peggy Stack's June 22, 2006 aticle, "Kepping Members a Challenge for the LDS Church" that ran in the Salt Lake Tribune. The Mormon Wiki reports that this makes up 64% of the church total membership. Of the 8 million people who still consider themselves to be Mormon, about half of those are active, according to John Dehlin's presentation "Why People Leave the LDS Church."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aska Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #36
44. Your sources are less than impeccable.
The 13,000,000 member worldwide Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the second fastest growing church in the USA. In April, 2008 the LDS Church officially reported that there were 279,218 convert baptisms in the year 2007.

It is true that many new members soon go inactive (as is probably the case with all churches and most secular organizations) but the notion that the LDS convert retention rate is "zero percent" is a huge stretch of someone's imagination.

http://www.newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/statistical-information

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
37. Small point of correction
Ezra Taft Benson agreed with the John Birch Society but was not a member, according to his grandson Steve Benson, who left the Mormon church and is now an atheist. He's also the political cartoonist for the Arizona Republic. He posts on a forum for ex-Mormons that I go to. I can't find the post where he said it, but it was fairly recent and I'm sure he said ETB was not a member of the John Birch Society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. hey...
I sometimes hang at the same site. ETB, had many many faults, I just don't remember what Steve Benson said about his Grandfathers relationship with the Birchers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aska Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. he didn't join
There's a 2005 book titled "David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism" by Gregory A. Prince and Wm. Robert Wright, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. In that well documented book it is mentioned that although Ezra Taft Benson (deceased former president of the LDS Church) was a supporter of the John Birch Society, he never did join.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
38. My two cents
It would probably be easy for me to conclude that Germany is a terrorist country full of terrorists since they massacred millions of people, including Jews, JW's, gays, etc. But I won't because that's just stupid. I know there were Germans who supported the Nazi regime and the ones who didn't but turned a blind eye to the atrocities. But I still refuse to use emotional generalizations and all the guilty by association bullshit to justify hatred for a group of people and a country.

So don't count on me with your appeal to "spread the word about what bigoted, racist, homophobic a-holes this church and its members really are." I understand that its leadership and some of its members let their bigotry be known with the proposition 8 campaign but I refuse to join you on your own hateful generalization.

I will, however, politely let any mormon who knocks on my door know that it is nothing personal against them but that I am not interested in hearing anything from a person who is speaking on behalf of an organization that has its leadership promoting bigotry against a group of people and trying to take away their civil rights. However, I refuse to make the assumption that the person knocking on my door is homophobe because assuming a Mormon is homophobic just because he/she is a a member of the LDS church is bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aska Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
45. Please provide proofs.
You have made some extremely serious charges about a group of fellow Americans who freely choose to be members of a specific church and are instigating action against them. Please provide proofs for each of your statements, thank-you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
46. More like a lie than an exaggeration, to be honest.
Terrorism is a word with a specific meaning. It doesn't just mean "bad".

And "is" means "is currently"; referring to things that happened a century ago to justify a statement about "is" is lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC