Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Randi: "What you have witnessed today is the end of American democracy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:20 PM
Original message
Randi: "What you have witnessed today is the end of American democracy"
She was pissed that the Dems didn't provide a unified front and that it appeared that only the "fringe" elements were concerned. Said that Republicans will now do whatever they want whenever they want.

I thought today was actually a good day for democracy. *shrugs*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Randi's glass is half empty. Mine's half full today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. me too. We had to start somewhere!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good day, but could have been better
if there had been a united front...........

It was a great opportunity but it was marginalized by Dems not standing together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. No Randi don't be stupid-silence was the end this was just the first peep
Or if it aint then she could be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Randi, honey you're way off on the date...Death of Democracy 12/12/00
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 04:39 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. yes sadly. But we must fight harder to get it back that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. She, as many here in DU, are missing the longer term
consequences.

I have written this in other threads... when Rosa Parks refused to surrender her seat back in 1955 nobody could think this would lead to the Civil Rights Act of 1965.

Have a longer range view... in the short term they will try to frame this as disafected extremist democrats, and the answer is... we want clean and fair elections regardless who wins, as long sa they are clean and fair.

THis is just the first battle in a long war, and this is what Randi is missing. The true first battle was in 2000 in Florida, and we did not even show for that one, but this one... we did... and Randi has to learn patience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. So do I.."have to learn patience"..thanks
for pointing this all out, nadin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
45. THANKS for that
we need to look at this as the BEGINNING

this regressive takeover of our beloved country didn't happen overnight

it's not to change overnight and its not going to change if we don't fight and fight and fight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. so what was the 5-4 scotus decision?
the beginning of the end? (Wolf!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bardgal Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree with her - this was the final nail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. And I agree with you, the final nail.
Don't these victory chearleaders realize that Bush owns the Executive, the Legislative, the Judiciary and the Press? The man is a Fascist Sociopath. We ain't got a chance through the Democratic process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sometimes I want to slip her a prozac.
I love her dearly, but she needs to look up and see the horizon sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. She says that pretty frequently
or words to that effect about how the GOP will steamroll. I take it as angry hyberbole because she keeps on fighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. She obviously wasn't here in DC.
If she had seen the speakers today, she would know that it was a great thing to behold the protest at Lafayette Park, and to march and see people on the streets of DC take notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitkat65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. How many people were there? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. I love Randi, but I see America ,and our future, a bit differently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. She needs to get a grip.
A couple days ago she would have been happy to have just one senator stand up. Well, two did, and several spoke. We had 40 some reps vote for contesting.

We had our discussion in both houses and Chenney and LeLay and all the rest had to sit there and TAKE IT.

God, that felt good. :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. What I witnessed was democracy in action. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry S Truman Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Randi is Right....Again
With the Dems who stayed silent (again!) and the corporate state media looking the other way, the path is crystal clear for the Right to do whatever they want. If you think we won anything today, you're whistling through the mine field.

And where was John Kerry? Trying to be Bush.
Damn them all to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Randi was kinda slow to get on the bandwagon, and slow to get off.
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 04:40 PM by FreepFryer
Boy, the radio pundits are kinda missing some points as they wallow in despair.

Hope they gather their collective wits and join in the optimistic effort to resolve our disenfranchisement.

<edited: I'm wrong here about Randi>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. You are very wrong here...
Randi was one of the ONLY ones to get on the voter fraud bandwagon from the very start. It was Mark Moran and Al Franken who kept telling us to "get over it" because "Bush won fair and square."

Today, Moran and Franken were as hyper as Randi in their desire to see ALL the Dems stand united. (I don't know how much they REALLY Meant it though.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Ah yes, you are right. I can recall listening to her after Nov 3. My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not a Sheep Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. No true actually. Randi was on these issues from the start. /eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUnspeakable Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Randi BUILT the bandwagon-
She was on vote fraud on Nov 3!!! (actually since 2000)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Actually on November 2nd, she was trying to get on the air on her own
radio station to tell them something rotten was going on in Ohio. She couldn't get on the air that night, a technical difficulty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Randi is correct.
Congressional Democrats were forced kicking and screaming into making statements supporting electoral integrity during the objection time period. They whispered sweet nothings to Tubbs and Boxer. But when push came to shove they sold us down the river one more time. No more blind allegiance to the Democratic Party for me. If they run somebody who (today) voted NAY, abstained, or was absent, for president in 2008 I will not vote for him/her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. She is right
Sorry to say. Senator Boxer stood and the democrats once again bent with the wind. Have they forgotten how many people voted for Kerry? 57 million is no small number - and it is beyond pathetic that only one senator would stand to be their voice.

It is abundantly clear that the democrats do not fight for who put them into office. And if they cannot or will not do that - then why vote for them at all?????? Really - I mean why vote for someone to be an empty hat???

I will not tell anyone who to vote for - but I would seriously consider alternatives to the democrats...as much as I love their founding principles and I agree with most of their statements - if they will not stand and fight - then they aren't worth my effort to vote for.

I applaud Senator Boxer. But the others...the ones who make pretty statements and then fall into GOP line without so much as a whimper......you lost my confidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Boxer bent in the wind? That's totally false!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. They all lost my confidence too
Don't ANY of them have ANY courage to fight for what's right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough already Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Didn't she get the memo?
This is a great "victory". She should be turning cartwheels over the fact that Bush gets 4 more years and not ONE Dem Senator had Boxer's back when the rubber met the road and it was time to actually VOTE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
govegan Donating Member (661 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 04:39 PM by govegan
Amerikan "democracy" sucks a rat's ass.

It always has.

What happened Nov. 1963?

What happened in 1968?

What happened with aiding the fascist war machines as they steamrolled the European liberals in Spain and elsewhere?

NO MORE EFFIN LIES FROM RANDI OR ANYONE ELSE!!!!!!!!!

We can only wish and hope and WORK for the death of the Amerikan neo-fascist plutocracy.

Hey, liberals and radicals and lovers of democracy,

Rise and shake your chains to the dust like dew
You are many and they are few.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. The media is now covering it instead of ignoring the election problems
It's just a start, people are stirred up, the bubble is about to burst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roenyc Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Randi has been through this in 2000 - she was hoping for more.
appears the Pundits are talking out of the asses right now too. so i am sure this will get lots of press of the retarded kind. but its OK. between trashing Kerry. and trashing the Dem's in the house hey its a damn banner day!

our people need to stand together. united they stand divided they fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaime_176 Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. Are they?
I hope so. I got rid of the TV after the election cause I just couldn't stand to watch anymore. I only wanted the news. Just the facts, but they weren't offering...except Cspan, and I didn't want to spend $53/month just for that when I can get it online. What are they saying? Anything positive for democracy??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. The Pugs are already doing whatever they want
The deathknell of democracy would have been if the answer had been "no" when Cheney asked, "And do you have a Senator who has signed with you."

Randi, who I do not take to be a naive person, nevertheless seems to be holding forth with the naive notion that the Dems would all rise as a body to denounce the Pugs.

Can you really see Lieberman being part of that fold? Zell Miller? Others of their ilk?

Also, if the Democrats had done that, the Pugs would have seized on the challenge as a purely partisan move (which they did anyway), but with photographs to match.

This way, the issue of rigged U.S. elections is on the table in front of the whole world, along with the rabid and unmistakeable Pug aversion to fair elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roenyc Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. what Randi was hoping for was
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 04:51 PM by roenyc
enough of a vote to cause the Ohio vote to be illegitimate and allow bush to be put into office by the house there by taking away his mandate and his capital. and hopefully his smirk. and making him illegitimate. edit (i am not sure i phrased that properly. do the best you can to get the gist of it. my head is pounding.)

thus giving the dems greater leverage in the next 4 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. I gotcha :)
Well, it would have been nice, but with both Houses controlled by the Pugs, that was always going to be a "fuhgedaboutit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. Democracy died a while ago
We're trying to revive it. This morning I heard it cough and fight for air. Let's keep applying the paddles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
35. If anyone thought this would change the election
... they were living in la la land. I don't think anyone here was really expecting for the electorate from Ohio to be thrown out, were they?

However, this is a great start. If anything it will ensure problems don't stop us from getting elected in 08 (if there will be an 08).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. She's making herself irrelevent.
Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Randi may be a lot of things
but irrelevent isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
38. She's always pissing and moaning
. . . that's her job.

I just tire of it easily.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
40. From what I can tell the information will now be in the record
and they can now investigate REAL change in our election process. I hope they will continue to fight behind the scenes to investigate *Co., but the goal was met in my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
41. It was a poor performance by the Democrats
and we gave many opportunities for the mainstream media to logically dismiss the entire issue, and few reasons to cover it.

On the other side, Maxine Waters was magnificent, powerful, wonderful. And a few of the republican callers into CSPAN, if legitimate, seemed newly concerned about voting irregularities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
43. Hey, it's a start. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
46. Thanks, Randi!
Randi is a realist. She can see from the ground up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC