Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pawlenty bringing back property-tax referendums

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 07:54 PM
Original message
Pawlenty bringing back property-tax referendums
This proposal is back in the news. Allowing each property-tax owner to vote for a referdum to raise property taxes. This of course bypasses the government process, in if you dislike the raise, kick out those who proposed it, do not circumvent them. Of course, renters have no say. That also adds to how unbalanced this makes it.

http://www.startribune.com/stories/587/5282779.html

"Pawlenty unveils thumbs up-thumbs down plan on property tax hikes
Dane Smith, Star Tribune
March 10, 2005 TURBO0310


A "Turbocharged Truth in Taxation" proposal -- a notification mechanism that would make it easier for property taxpayers to turn back levy increases by city and county governments -- was outlined today by Gov. Tim Pawlenty and House Taxes Committee Chairman Phil Krinkie, R-Shoreview.

Pawlenty, who presented the proposal at a meeting of the Minnesota Association of Realtors, said the Taxpayer Satisfaction Survey was an effort to make government "more dynamic, more responsive and more accountable to the people."

Local government officials and DFL legislative leaders attacked the proposal as unfair and unworkable.

The proposed system, which would require legislative approval, would work like this:

Attached to the bottom of the notices of planned property taxes -- the "Truth in Taxation" notices mailed in November -- would be a simple new Taxpayer Satisfaction Survey. The detachable form asks taxpayers two yes or no questions about whether taxpayers are satisfied with the proposed property tax levy for their county and for the city in which their property is located.

If the number of mailed-in negative responses exceeded 20 percent of the total parcels of property in the jurisdiction, a referendum would be triggered, and voters would be able to choose between two options: the proposed levy and the actual levy for the prior year. Property owners would get a vote on the triggering decision for each parcel they own. Renters would not vote. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only property owners can vote, huh?
Gee, here I thought we had grown out of that concept what, a couple of centuries ago?

Pawlenty is a slimy fuck and I can't wait to see him booted out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC