Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I used to think this was a draw...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:05 AM
Original message
I used to think this was a draw...
Edited on Wed Oct-06-04 12:05 AM by Uzybone
but between
"Ive never met you till tonight" (LIE)
factcheck.com (BLUNDER)
"Ive never blamed 9/11 on Iraq" (LIE)
Cheneys atrocious voting record in the House (STILL SHOCKING)
Cheneys "I could give a shit" attitude about the HIV question
and the polls that have come out so far.

I have to say I was wrong. This was another step back for Bush/ Cheney and a leap forward for Kerry/Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm in perfect agreement... though the polls
are deceiving, I think.

I'm just disappointed in Edwards, because I really think he's got a lot more fire in him than he showed tonight. Bummer, totally, but still, I do think he won, mostly because of the points you mentioned above.

I hope Kerry kicks ass- utterly - on Friday.

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Right on! I concur.
Edwards did fine, although he could have pulled a whole lotta shit out of his arsenal.

For being fairly new in the political world, he held his own just fine. I'm sure the one-on-one sit down format must have been imposing for someone like him.

We got what we wanted out of tonight, a draw at the worst (I'm not counting MSGOP). Undecideds heavily favored Edwards. Historically, VP debates don't have a huge impact, so I doubt we'll be seeing a huge shift in poll numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. the "Ive never met you till tonight"
will be major, IMHO.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eye and Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think it was a draw for awhile - then Edwards made ground
I also think, like other posters, that he held back. Someone wrote that this was like a deposition - get 'em to say stuff so you can trap them later. Tonight doesn't end it - so that makes great sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. That might had been the strategy... deposition *ala Clinton*
PAYBACK

Now all that needs to be done is for the media to print and televise the lies repeatedly. STRESSING with headlines that send the message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil Dog Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Here is my thinking on the deposition analogy
Edwards didn't call out Cheney on the lies (particularly the easy ones like "never linked Saddam to 9/11" and "We've never met") because as an experienced litigator, Edwards knows that - in a deposition - it is better to lock a person in on his "testimony" then to push back and give them a chance to weasel out of it when you have them in a demonstrable lie. Then, when you are in trial you hit them with the lie in front of the jury, and their credibility is shot.

Here, had Edwards pushed back, there is a chance that Cheney would have weaseled out of it some (not sure how, but he COULD have tried). As it is now, K/E have clean statements from Cheney, and they can now run clean commercials showing Cheney saying one thing tonight, and something else long ago (like saying Saddam himself ordered airplanes into the WTC).

It took discipline, but Edwards held back and did the right thing.

This is different than calling him out on "argument" issues (like saying the war is going well) where you push him back on the issue now as well as running commercials showing him being out of touch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eye and Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. credits to you - you're my source of the analogy
Nice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil Dog Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks.
I really think that is what he is thinking. It was too sweet for him not to notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnyrocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. That "I never met you" should play out nicely, if the fucking media
is doing its job. Which is rare these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. DU the media to fact check
That's going to be the real spin....Cheney is lying constantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush equals idiot Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. The beauty of it
Cheney actually said Americans should go to factcheck.com to prove his record was not as Edwards stated it. LOL and double LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NEDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. I agree except
for the polls part. The online polls are pretty much, well you know. The CBS poll of undecideds was good though, even the ABC poll wasn't bad when you factor in the oversampling of pugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think that tonight's results show that the people
just hate Dick Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gemlake Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. "you're no JFK" backfire
One reason the "I've never met you until tonight" line was such a blunder is that Cheney obviously wanted it to be a big "I knew JKF and you're no JFK" moment. I would have loved Edwards to respond--"there you go again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. Definitely. It turned into a walk for JE
Total victory! An excellent debate performance followed by a truth-challenged meltdown by Dickie. Suh-weeeeeet!
:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC