Remember when that was said about a candidate of the past? Was that Richard Nixon?? The point is, at that time, having a "tan" was a positive. And an indication of the degree of effectiveness of this propaganda machine that can make a "tan" into a negative? What next?
My opponent stays up late at night. He doesn't get into bed until midnight. He's an intellectual - he reads all the time. He likes to vacation out on the ski slopes of Idaho. He likes to eat all those "healthy foods" - he's not a hamburger and hotdog man. And on and on...it's amazing what these folks can turn into a negative. Almost anything that is positive. One might expect them to even turn a preemptive invasion into a positive.
But I think people are going to laugh right in the freepers' sour faces if they try to push the idea of turn tanning into a negative. The very fact that they're even thinking of persuing this proves exactly how tone-deaf they are.
They've gotten a free ride for so long that they think their verbal shit doesn't stink. It's gonna get pretty smelly for the American public over the next several weeks.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.