Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We will get PO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ind_thinker2 Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 03:56 PM
Original message
We will get PO
Edited on Fri Oct-23-09 04:06 PM by ind_thinker2


this is same post as TPM //

http://www.dailykos.com/

I am no longer angry, thanks for soothing touch

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Buh bye! Unnamed sources rule! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. "snatching defeat from the jaws of victory" -- more from the article here:

"...snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Reid is nearly there on cloture vote with the public option. The only point here would be being able to call the thing "bipartisan." Guess what? No one outside of the Village gives a shit if it's bipartisan. Particularly the Democratic base that needs to be energized in 2010 for turnout."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dailyl Kos isn't in on the meetings with Obama. Why don't you just wait and see
what happens before getting all depressed?

Your ulcers will thank you for it. :7

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. They didn't confirm anything they just linked to the TPM story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is just reporting from the same article
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't believe it. No. Really. I don't believe it.
As in I'm calling bullshit unless someone on the inside is willing to put his or her name on this story.

Until then, this is the usual salacious, frequently wrong Beltway gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
argonaut Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not voting in 2012? Good idea, because President Palin will doubtless introduce the public option.
Edited on Fri Oct-23-09 04:03 PM by argonaut
Oh, wait!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. You're really stinking it up in here today!
All of these blogs are just "reporting" what Talking Points put up from "unnamed sources".

All you're doing is posting the same story over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. So you say that won't be voting in 2012? Well, we hate to see you go, but
Edited on Fri Oct-23-09 04:05 PM by FrenchieCat
bu-bye! :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Engineer4Obama Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Correction
Daily Kos Reports that Talking Points Memo sources unnamed sources claim that the white house is pushing a trigger.

Then again the on the record comment of Jarret on Morning Joe this morning said the exact opposite.

So color me confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. They Confirm Nothing, They Repost The Story Posted On TPM
Here's Ezra Klein's take, which is not as doomy gloomy:

Within the last week, Chuck Schumer moved from talking to various senators about a national public option with a state opt-out clause to actually conducting something of a whip count on the proposal. His team found that a number of moderates didn't love the idea, and might vote to strip it on the floor, but it wasn't enough to push them toward a filibuster. At about this point, Harry Reid began sending out some feelers of his own, and the response was positive enough that he warmed to including it in the bill.

Then Max Baucus held a meeting.

Here, stories begin to diverge. Depending on who you talk to, Baucus either held a routine, informational meeting telling the Senate moderates and members of the Senate Finance Committee what's going on, as he's been doing fairly regularly, or he held a meeting in which he tried to rally Senate moderates to change Reid's mind. Or maybe there's no difference between the two. The first to really speak out after the meeting was Sen. Ben Nelson, and, as one staffer pointed out, Nelson didn't need Baucus to remind him that he was opposed to a national public option. Soon enough, Olympia Snowe was also making firm statements against the public option, and threatening a filibuster.

On Thursday night, Reid went over to the White House for a talk with the president. The conversation centered on Reid's desire to put Schumer's national opt-out plan into the base bill. White House officials were not necessarily pleased, and they made that known. Everyone agrees that they didn't embrace Reid's new strategy. Everyone agrees that the White House wants Snowe on the bill, feels the trigger offers a safer endgame, and isn't convinced by Reid's math. But whether officials expressed a clear preference for the trigger, or were just worried about the potential for 60 votes, is less clear. One staffer briefed on the conversation says "the White House basically told us, 'We hope you guys know what you're doing.'"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. TPMDC is reporting that, not Daily Kos. Oh, and Ezra Klein is also reporting that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Klein's Report Is a Bit More Nuanced And Realistic IMO
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Buh-bye, Doomsday! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Thats becoming a given. The real debate is what kind of PO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Only a small percentage of Americans will get the public option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's how it starts.....
And a start is all that we need. It will give a chance for the program to
be perfected prior to an avalanche of folks coming in.
Sounds smart to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC