Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PM 'refused extra Afghan troops'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 10:32 PM
Original message
PM 'refused extra Afghan troops'
Well, here is how this issue looks on the other side of the pond.

PM 'refused extra Afghan troops'

Page last updated at 02:32 GMT, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 03:32 UK


Prime Minister Gordon Brown refused a major Afghanistan troop reinforcement against the military's advice, the former head of the Army has said.

Gen Sir Richard Dannatt stood down in August 2009 after repeatedly speaking out against what he said were equipment shortages and poor pay and conditions.

He told the Sun that ministers had to be taken "screaming and kicking" to agree to necessary measures.

Downing Street has denied refusing a request for 2,000 extra personnel.

The cabinet is due to sit within the week to consider another request from military chiefs for more troops

<snip>

Gen Dannatt told the newspaper that the military's task was made harder by operating with what he terms "at least part of one arm tied behind one's back".

He added: "The military advice has been for an uplift since the beginning of 2009.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8291935.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. It just means we'll have to send more.
You've been saying all or nothing right? Well it looks like all just got bigger. Enjoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. others are committing - link
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 10:41 PM by AuntPatsy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't relish this one bit!
(M)any currently serving in Helmand say more boots on the ground are vital - and that initially, they may have to be British until enough Afghan security forces can be trained to take over.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8291935.stm

And then there is this from the Liberal Democrat Party:

Lib Dems urge Afghan policy shift

The war in Afghanistan cannot be won unless current policies are changed, the Liberal Democrats have said.

In a joint newspaper article, party leader Nick Clegg and former leader Lord Ashdown accuse the international community of lacking a united strategy.

The article, in the Guardian, says Nato is "a hotch potch of the committed and the half hearted" and calls for the UK to appoint an Afghanistan minister.

They also call for a war cabinet to be established by the UK government.

Their article says the UK government needs to "change gear".

"The prime minister needs to make it clear that this struggle is now the nation's priority and we will strain every sinew to win it," it says.

"In wars from the Falklands to Iraq, the prime minister formed a special war cabinet. Why not now? Why not a minister for Afghanistan?"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8262129.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC