|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:37 PM Original message |
Poll question: Do you support forced insurance premiums on Americans like car insurance? As Pres Obama just said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Yes. The Swiss have that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. Ditto. Depends...it's an ins. co./Republican feature. So there needs to be a Progressive feature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. If we're not going to have actual national health coverage, then I'll go with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markbark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. There's a big difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. Absolutely not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. No money or insurance - no health care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. I support the elimination of insurance premiums totally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. I like that idea a helluva lot better! His saying that Insurance companies serve a purpose made a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmilyAnne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. Depends on the terms, on the hardship exemptions, etc. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. Which question am I answering? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. Where's the FUCK NO option? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Yes, you will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitsune (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
12. Who the hell is voting yes on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Engineer4Obama (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. Do you support push polling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calmblueocean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
14. If there are fair hardship exemptions and it means health care reform finally passes? Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hollowdweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
15. I support it 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. But you know what sucks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
16. No (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yes, I do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
18. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
21. Whoa, way to totally spin and misrepresent what he said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. details... explain what you think he said. I heard making it mandatory for everyone to get ins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:54 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. He absolutely did NOT say it woudl be mandatory for everyone to get insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:59 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. and he absolutely did NOT say that he meant only young people, the text says ---- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 09:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Right -- this is the only way a single payer would work, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 09:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. now that's SPOT on! We all should be encouraged and told why it's important to get involved & why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 09:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I don't think that'll happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
26. If it comes to that, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 09:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. thanks Sparkly! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobinA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
31. With single-payer - 4% from your check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
32. Deleted message |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 09:15 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. you are a joke. you don't follow rules, just like Rep. Wilson. You need to be reprimanded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
37. yes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
38. Hell no. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
39. Hell no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-09-09 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
40. For those who CAN afford it, but choose not to? YES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-10-09 12:06 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. But their definition of what you can "afford" and the common person's definition of affordable are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-10-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. I agree. "affordable" needs to be clearly defined. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-10-09 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
42. Deleted sub-thread |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-10-09 03:48 AM Response to Original message |
43. Yes... 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC