Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Atheists Had Better Watch Their Backs In California

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:23 PM
Original message
Atheists Had Better Watch Their Backs In California
Since mob rule is the law, they could take away YOUR rights, too.

Atheists are the most reviled minority in this country. More reviled than gay people. More reviled than nearly any minority you'd care to name.

And since the upholding of Prop H8 by the CASC was predicated upon the precedent that the state could curb the right to vote by felons via proposition, watch out.

The next step might be to go after the right to vote by Atheists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. What needs careful attention is any potential violations of the US
Constitution. Any ballot measure to take away voting rights would clearly not stand up in court.

The argument needs to be crafted how Prop 8 violates the US Constitution. Equal protection is the most obvious route to take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Okay, how about not allowing Atheists to marry?
There's a sticky wicket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That would be more analogous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep. That's what I've been thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah but we're much harder to spot
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Aaah, I can tell 'em by the way they walk.
It's all in the hips.

Certainly the fantasists are out in the open these days, and this is the BIGGEST problem I have and have had for a long time with our President, but the tide of history is on our side, just as it is for gays: reality will not be cowed forever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
no one is safe in an atmosphere like this.

which group is up next...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You are so right.
Damn I so wish evolution would pick up some speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Ah, but evolution is not always to the better
That was why Idiocracy could make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. either evolution, or emotional maturity, whichever comes first for the human race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Exactly
Enough of this "you're different from me therefore you must be inferior" shit!

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. okay so we need a proposition to prevent atheists from marrying
Edited on Tue May-26-09 02:38 PM by Fresh_Start
to setup a battle royale, though I honestly think that infertile people and people who don't want to have children should be banned from marriage as well. After all how can allowing people who are not pro-family marry be a family values position.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Yeah, why are infertile people allowed to marry?
Since, apparently, the only reason for marriage is children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. No one is coming after Atheists in California
And I believe Prop 8 will be overturned by California voters in the near future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. You mean the same voters who just passed it in November?
Then why did they pass it in November, confusion? No, these are the same people who voted Arnold into office twice, that's all. The same people who backed the racist Pete Wilson, another CA Gov of wonder. I spend almost all of my life in CA, and if they are not voting on the rights they don't want immigrants to have, then it is gay people. It has been that way there for ages on end. Humans are forced to beg for decent treatment periodically by the California voters.
I remember one of my first votes was cast against a popular California measure to fire all the gay teachers, back in 78. Briggs. We defeated that one, but it took some hard core work. And here we are 31 years on, California again wanting to vote away rights from gay folk, having gone as far as you dare with the immigrant population. But CA is always ganging up on a minority and voting on 'em.
The denial thing is very much last week. CA needs to step up or shut up. Believe that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. It was a narrow vote, the more time that passes the more support for gay marriage grows
The longer we wait the more young people (who overwhelmingly support gay marriage) turn 18 and can vote, and the more older people (who tend to be more strongly against gay marriage) die off. Nate Silver predicted that in 2010 Californians would reject ballot initiatives to ban gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Both my parents (80 years old) voted for 8 but now regret their decision.
I believe it will be overturned next year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. My atheist self and my atheist wife have been married for years.
Atheists, smokers, fat people... they can't all be the most reviled minority in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. well they can yes
But atheists in the sense of political acceptability and perceived trustworthiness ARE the most reviled. See Pew and U Minn studies for a start.

It's not always only about marriage. Seven state constitutions ban atheist from holding public office for a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. its gotten to the point that I wouldn't want to visit or live in Calif.



the state used to have lots of human energy and a forward thinking outlook.

now I think of Calif. as being dingy.

the weather has battered it good, causing all kinds of destruction.

the people have been continually robbed by one kind of Baron or another.

bad weather and the Barons haven't gone away. the future looks . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well I wouldn't go that far beating on Cali is no the smartest political strategy. >
Edited on Wed May-27-09 04:01 PM by cooolandrew
Our work is to make the case for more tolerance in California not entrench folks that have those views and lose the state in a GE. That's like 50 steps backwards, the whole agenda of prop 8 was not gay marriage it's about the GOP returning to power that's all in the end they care about. When we attack California we are playing right into their hands and they love it. It's a wonderful state california it's not like there aren't views we disagree with in other states too. So let's be cool. Sure we might gain other states but it's not wisest move to lose the big trophy. Especially if the aim is to see more rights for the LGBT community however big or small. You have to see the end objective and keep all allies close even if we have certain disagreements with those faithful allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. We've always had to watch our backs everywhere.
And actually, we score lower than TERRORISTS in public opinion polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Okay, I'll become a Satanist then.
Since it's a religion, I'll be a member of a protected class. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. If I were to get religion, it would probably be that one.
Edited on Wed May-27-09 10:26 PM by burning rain
'Cause if there's a heaven, I sure don't want to go there when I die. Word has it there's no sin there, so send me where the notoriously pro-naughtiness Devil reigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. So is there even a fringe movement to disenfranchise atheists
or are you completely making this up out of thin air?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC