Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British critics compare new Star Trek movie to President Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 01:23 PM
Original message
British critics compare new Star Trek movie to President Obama
"...the $150 million film is being rapturously greeted by preview audiences as the funniest, cleverest, most action-packed Star Trek movie ever. But just how did it manage to get it so right?

One fashionable theory involves the miraculous, golden, healing rays of the mighty galactic God-Emperor Obama. It has been suggested that the previous Star Trek movie – Nemesis (2002) – was dark and depressing and a bit rubbish because it coincided with the vile, Klingon-esque George W Bush administration. Whereas the new one was always going to be great because, hey, so’s the world now Obama is President.

But the latest critic to put forward this thesis got badly flamed on the internet by conservatives..."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/5196001/All-of-a-sudden-its-cool-to-be-a-Trekkie.html

The movie looks gorgeous. Gone is the gloom of the last Star Trek film, Nemesis (2002), which seemed cast in the depressing shadow of George Bush’s post-9/11 America. The prequel, though conceived before the rise of Barack Obama, taps into the optimism of his presidency. If thoughtful philosophical discourse of the Star Trek kind is at a minimum here, there’s certainly no shortage of narrative momentum, a skill Abrams earlier exhibited as co-creator of the hit TV series Lost.

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/film_reviews/article6135968.ece

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Way cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Considering that James T. Kirk was consciously modeled on JFK by Gene
Roddenberry, that's interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I can't wait. I think it opens May 7th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. A swing and MISS on the point...
Optimism and hope for the future have been at the core of Star Trek since its very inception. When it failed, it did so because it got away from that idealism in an attempt to pander to the dystopian elements among SF fandom.

Yes, I AM a TOS trekkie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I dug them all HUGE-but find Tom Paris of Voyager a hoot because
he's (or was) such a bad boy, criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. If you haven't seen the trailer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC