Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lobbyists fight back against Obama - lawsuit in the works

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 01:47 PM
Original message
Lobbyists fight back against Obama - lawsuit in the works
Huffington Post:

A strange bedfellows coalition of non-governmental organizations is pushing back hard against one of the Obama administration's most stringent ethics policies, declaring it counterproductive and possibly unconstitutional.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the American League of Lobbyists (ALL) hosted a conference call on Tuesday to persuade the president to reverse a rule that bars executive branch officials from having phone or face-to-face conversations with registered lobbyists on matters relating to the stimulus. And while, on the surface, the effort seems at odds with the prevailing winds of public opinion, legal observers say that, at least in a court of law, the groups have a case.

"My hunch is that they will lose their lawsuits," said Tom Gerety, a constitutional law professor at New York University. "But it is a shrewd move on their part and a constitutionally valid move."

Certainly, the Obama administration's policy has touched a sensitive nerve within the lobbying community. In an email sent last week to fellow lobbyists, Dave Wenhold, President of ALL, made the rather dramatic case that he and others were being discriminated against and demonized, illegally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick! I can't believe that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Most important part:
"My hunch is that they will lose their lawsuits," said Tom Gerety, a constitutional law professor at New York University. "But it is a shrewd move on their part and a constitutionally valid move."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. the scary part is that it's constitutional. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where in the Constitution does it say we must let lobbyists run our government?
Nothing about lobbying is "equal petitioning." Your or I write a message to [email protected] while these lobbyists, employed by powerful companies, talk to and influence people a stones throw away from the president. There's nothing equal about that. Write down your demands like everybody else and let them be on public record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Right on n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. The ACLU is such a great org, but this former employee has always disagreed with them on $ = speech.
Edited on Tue Mar-31-09 03:27 PM by Political Heretic
The ACLU opposes campaign finance reform with things like bans on soft money and such as a violation of free speech. They oppose these rules on similar grounds. I disagree with them so strongly on this, which is so weird because I agree with them on every other formal stance they have.

Great organization that happens to be wrong (imo) about money = speech. When money = speech, we have greater inequality of voice between the haves and the have nots than if we conclude that money does not equal speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. The same ones who complain about lobbyist are now defending them?
How are we ever going to limit their influence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. They better start looking for a Gentleman's club
they should asked Wall St. where former brokers are strutting
their stuff on the poll.

It's a brilliant career change and a lucrative one too, I
might add....:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC