Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should blanket anti-Union posts be allowed on DU

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:44 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should blanket anti-Union posts be allowed on DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. anti union Democrats are about as logical as anti semitic Jews
Are there really such people here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes
look carefully in the flood of let the car companies go broke threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. right over here,
I can count on one hand how many unions I have any respect for,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Thankfully
That hand has thousands of fingers. :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. I assume you mean the leadership and not the members...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. Do you also think outsourcing is good for the economy?
I have a feeling you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. not at all
I actually had a hand in killing a large outsourcing project earlier this year, I just believe that most unions have long since become not simply irrelevant but destructive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Well that's good to know.
So what do you propose as an alternative to unions, as it pertains to protecting the rights of workers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Well...
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 03:56 PM by IanDB1

Anti-Semitic Jews


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I recognize Ben Stein, but who's the other guy?
Grandpa Munster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Jackie Mason. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. I believe Michael (Weiner) Savage belongs on that list, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Damn straight anti-Union posts should be allowed on DU!
The War of Northern Aggression is not over!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Ba-zing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Especially not in the South! Who says Americans have short memories?
I lived in the South when I was going to highschool and let me tell you they talk about things that happened two generations back as if it happened yesterday. And they can hold a grudge for over a Century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. You mean we get to burn Georgia again?
And blow away the traitors? Fucking awesome! Go USA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. No.
And I dont think I should have to get that crap in my email box from my employer either.. but alas I get pelted with a "Facts you should know about Unions" email at least once a month or so.

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think it depends on what we mean by that.
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 03:57 PM by Occam Bandage
"Unions are scum, and employees who want to unionize should be fired or shot" doesn't belong here.

"Quality-of-life concessions made to the Union workforce of the automobile industry have ironically made it more difficult--if not impossible--for the American auto industry to compete in the new globalized market, and we should look at harsh measures like pay cuts and health-benefit cuts as part of a comprehensive cost-control program if we're serious about ensuring that GM and the jobs it provides survive the decade intact" is a somewhat controversial viewpoint, but one that deserves to be debated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. It's not the unions' fault if companies negotiated badly
One of the problems with US corporations is that they never took the long view when making corporate decisions. It was always pegged to next month's P&L statement. So, when they were flush with money, they never planned for the days when they wouldn't be flush with money.

Giving concessions to unions wasn't the only area where they failed in their stewardship. Yes, unions demanded a lot, but the job of union negotiators is to get the best deal for their members. It's not to tell the corporate management how to do their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I don't think it is either. Union/management relations are adversarial, much as our court system is.
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 04:18 PM by Occam Bandage
Saying "the Unions did too good a job of negotiating" is a bit like looking at a court case and saying "the defense attorney did too good a job getting his client off." That's not the way it works.

I don't think that a claim that too much of GM's money per car produced goes to pay/benefits must be accompanied by any declaration of blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm generally against censorship and the Democratic party is not monolithic
Besides that, there is rarely if ever anti-union material on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. The right to Unionize is a Progressive Value, and this is a Progressive Message Board. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. That's it in a nutshell.
I can't even believe we're debating this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Right
The original question is vague. And DU can handle debate on union issues and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
47. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'll give an opinion when you clarify what you mean.
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 03:57 PM by JeffR
Just sayin'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, free speech but they should be prepared to be flamed pretty hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Exactly
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. The "flamed pretty hard" thing is the kicker. Yesterday I saw a confessed Libertarian,
spouting his Libertarian talking points, prefacing them with a plea not to criticize his opinion.

I've professed an unpopular view or two here, gotten flamed (and educated) and sucked it up.

I suppose progressives can be anti-union, but I think most of us aren't so--hellooo?--you are gonna get heat if you are. And that is how it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipfilter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. People can say what they want.
However, unions are inherently blue and I credit my union for completing my transformation from R to D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. No, idiots should be able to make anti-union posts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happychatter Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. until I came here I didn't know there WERE such things.... the PRO-Union responses are good
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 04:24 PM by happychatter
and maybe the anti-union sentiments of a few are good to have posted, so others get to hear the pro-union argument MORE often, eh?

it frames up a discussion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. I've never seen a "blanket anti-Union post" on DU
and I've been here since 2004.

Perhaps you could provide a link to one of these posts that you are concerned about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. oooh.... CONCERNED. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mokawanis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. I am ready and willing to argue in favor of unions
against any moron that actually thinks they're a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
27. For those saying no, some people do come to DU to learn
I think that the trolls who actually come here to propagate right wing garbage are a vast minority, although they are a vocal one.

As hard as it is to believe, not everybody on DU is an activist or spends a lot of time following politics or reading about history. So when they post something that may seem anti-union to you, it may be simply that they don't know a whole lot about unions and have come to DU to try and get a progressive viewpoint on the subject. Rather than having the mods delete their posts, it would be far more productive to try and persuade them as to why they should support unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our fourth quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. God-Damned Scab !!!
:evilgrin:

:hide:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
34. I am a supervisor of a union shop..and I say they deserve every dime they get...! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
35. Huh
Last time I check this country is freedom of the press. People should be mature enough to handle pro or con issues about anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. The First Amendment applies ONLY to the government, not private entities.
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 09:35 PM by blondeatlast
DU is a privately run business so they can throw those that come in and disrupt the place out at will.

Do you want to argue? I'm and ex-librarian and and very big--and educated--about the First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. hahahaha. I think it's ironic that while you were trying to give yourself textual fellatio you
misspelled the word "an".

"Do you want to argue? I'm and ex-librarian and and very big--and educated--about the First Amendment."

Are you threatening me? My name is Cornholio!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. You're so cute! nt
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 10:36 PM by blondeatlast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. ......oooooooook....... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. Do we really want to censor all opposing viewpoints on a discussion forum?
I'm an ex-member of the USWA and pro-union, myself. But as much as I support unions, I value freedom of speech more. Sorry. On a Democratic board, I would say someone who is blatantly against most progressive values should be subject to being banned, but to ban someone simply for an opposing view on one particular issue just seems wrong to me. I hope this board never gets that lock-step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. Blanket anti-union posts should be pizza fodder.
That's probably gonna be a self-correcting problem, though. Complete opposition to unions will creep out in other, even less welcome ways.

Constructive criticism of unions ought to be encouraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
40. Yes, and everyone else, proceed to rip that DUer a new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. That's my thought as well. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
45. Lets not pretend that all unions, at their top levels are these benevolent orgs
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 09:30 PM by Wolsh
They like everything else, are controlled by money at the top and as such are open from criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
That Is Quite Enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
46. I don't agree with their opinions, but I think they should still be allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
49. I voted yes mainly because I have a feeling that people would interpret the statement...
differently, depending on how they feel about unions. You know...as to whether a post is a so-called blanket statement against unions.

So I err on the side of inclusiveness of opinions and freedom of speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
50. Free Speech is Free Speech.
Of course they should be allowed. What self-respecting liberal would ever even think to ask that question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
52. Y'know, a capital "U" makes it seem like you are talking about the country
where I think you should be using a little "u" for the union.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Aren't you precious?
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 10:35 PM by blondeatlast
You're ADORABLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. my god.... my psycho ex-nanny found me on the internet!
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
57. Yes, after all, we are all Democrats
I find anti-union comments foolish and distasteful. But we are still all Dems so we should be able to discuss that subject openly and honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
58. no, anyone who's anti-union and democratic probably does not understand
what unions are all about, why they are so crucial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC