Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

in case you missed the debate, here's the short version:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 12:49 AM
Original message
in case you missed the debate, here's the short version:

obama: if we can take bin laden out, and pakistan won't help, we should take him out anyway.

mclame: obama just announced that he's going to send tanks into pakistan the day he takes office! he's horribly naive and a traitor for giving away military movements! me, i would coddle any terrorist that can find a willing country to harbor them! bin laden will be perfectly safe in islamabad as long as i'm president! oh, and i have a secret plan for ending bin laden's life.



obama: if you make less than $250,000 a year, you'll get a tax cut.

mclame: obama's got like six tax proposals, i can't keep them straight. first it's a cut from anyone under $250,000. then it's a hike for anyone over $250,000. then it's a cut for 95% of the people. then it's a hike for 5% of the people. then it's only the poor and the middle class who get the tax cut. then it's only the rich who get a tax hike. see, he keeps changing his position, just like jell-o, and we all know how evil jell-o is. but i'll make it simple for you. obama's tax cut plan was copied word for word from herbert hoover's tax hike plan! he'll single-handedly cause a repeat of the great depression! obama will hike taxes on all employers, who will then fire YOU! tax increases only work when *i* propose them, as in my health care plan. taxing employers on their health care benefits will cause the economy to boom; taxing employers on their profits will cause another great depression.



brokaw: as moderator, i have to inform you that you that i am powerless to stop you from going over the time limits.



obama: we're going to have to prioritize.

mclame: i'll solve all our problems before naptime on inauguration day. one of us up here is really lazy. hint: that one.




obama: i'd like to address the social security problem in my first term.

mclame: solving social security is easy-peasy! i just takes some bipartisanship, and i'm the bipartisanest guy there is! nobody gets bipartisaner then me! i'm so bipartisan i actually SAW ronald reagan and tip o'neill talk to each other! it doesn't get more bipartisan than that! and all that bipartisanality means that social security is solved if i'm president! because you don't need an actual PLAN to solve problems, you just need an agreement between the two parties. the mere act of agreement actually makes the social security fund solvent through eternity!



obama: george bush shouldn't have called on america to go shopping after 9/11.

mclame: america needs to sacrifice earmarks. i'm a reformer. my party hates me. the other party hates me, too. independents hate me. everybody hates me. you should like me because i am universally hated. i once killed a big boondoggle of an earmark for the sole purpose of replacing it with an even bigger earmark. now that's reform. there's a lot of waste in defense spending, so i'm going to freeze all spending except for defense. and senate perks, can't freeze that. wait, if i'm president, i won't get senate perks anymore. can i take that back?




brokaw: thank you, both. now kindly move so i can see my teleprompter and awkwardly avoid shaking hands. good night.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's quite good
I think you summed up McCain's positions brilliantly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. obama was so ... hinged, by comparison, wasn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Obama was so...focused!
Edited on Wed Oct-08-08 01:12 AM by goodgd_yall
I thought he was on the attack tonight, too, more so than in the last debate. He did fine.

I like how you described McCain's idea of six different tax proposals that he can't keep straight because Obama is, you know, always changing his answer. I was thinking, "what the hell is he talking about? I've only heard one."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. self-kick, because i stayed up late on this one :)
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. debate cliff notes here!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. i approve this message
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holiday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
voteearlyvoteoften Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. What a relief to hear Obama speak.
What a shame we had to listen to 8 years of disconnected double talk. My tension headache is going away.
And funny post..good morning grins to all, and to all a good day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. In what respect, unblock?
Nice summary :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. brilliant summary! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. I could have saved some time. What flavor of Jell-o?
I hate Jell-o too. Should I vote for McCain?

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. What was with the mixed Jello/bus metaphor
"It's like trying to nail jello to the wall, and they'll be another by any minute"

The first mixed metaphor of the debate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. mixed metaphors really rub me up the wrong tree!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. We will now go to Section F where a NAVY GUY will ask if we love Israel
and a lady in section C wants to equate Iran with Cambodia

not that these are anyway skewed towards either candidate :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. it was a bit outrageous to a NAVY guy.
of course, asking if we'd defend israel is a pretty idiotic question. of course we would no matter who was president.
i've never understood how republicans can get away with claiming that they win on "issues" that we all agree on.

for decades, they got mileage out of opposing the ussr, when in fact there was little, if any, difference in the view of democrats vs. republicans regarding the ussr. what little difference there was was pretty much just in rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. The lady in section C got her picture taken with Obama
So, I think she was on his side, or decided to be on his side during the debate. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. That was funny....good one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good job. Could you do the next one
before hand so we don't even have to watch?

BAWHAHHAHAHAHA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. i could just recycle this one :) i doubt anything novel will happen.
then again, mclame might do something really mavericky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. lol @ brokaw
kickity! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. You captured the spirit of McLiar's scrambled dissembling very well. //
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. mcdesperate? mcxaggerator? mctightlywound?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC