Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wouldn't it be great if Obama appoints both Clintons to the USSC?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:53 PM
Original message
Wouldn't it be great if Obama appoints both Clintons to the USSC?
LOL... talk about making some Repub heads explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
galactical Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Would bill take it?
I have a feeling that Senator Clinton would be ok with it. But I doubt Bill would take Obama up on that offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. doubtful and Hillary probably would not either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
30. Not a chance for Bill,and I will repeat this again ...
Bill would not want tied down to, for starters.

I will repeat about Hill - the supreme court is the HOLY GRAIL for fundies. BO will be lucky to simply appoint a competent NON facist SC without the right wing going ape snot. The right wing would, literally, get the guns out and hit the streets if he put Hill up. There is not an R in the senate who could vote for her confirmation. It would turn the senate into a Jerry Springer episode, and they WOULD force the filibuster issue, saying the Ds were trying to backdoor the constitution with a political appointee - forget their hypocrasy, they have no personal reflection to see it themselves, so it won't matter.

It would be a complete and total circus - one that NO president could survive, IMO, and certainly not one that "no drama Obama" would bring on himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Political appointees are never good options. I want solid jurists.
The knife in the heart of GOPers would be fun, but I'd prefer truly qualified legal scholars with a long history of service on the bench in lower courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. NO. Not great, not even close. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Please, enough with the Clintons
Obama winning is more than enough to spite the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Um, no.
That would make MY head explode.

I'm sorry, but this post was really naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. It would be good spectacle but poor judgement.
A justice should be independent and having a husband/wife team on the court would create too much conflict of interest. I do hope he nominates Hillary if she wants it, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. No. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. No. Appointing old, moderate federal judges is what's gotten us into this mess.
Obama needs to have an 'under 50 years old' policy for all new appointees to the federal judiciary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wasn't there another ex-president who served on the court?
I want to say Taft, but I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes, I believe Taft was put on the SC, I think after leaving office, but could be wrong
Taft was definitely on the Supreme Court though.

Taft also holds the distinction of being the only incumbent president ever to finish in 3rd place when running for reelection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yup, Taft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. No, it wouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. No, and I doubt either Clinton would want the position. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Laser Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm all for making republican heads explode, but...
...I have a hard time seeing either Clinton in the SC. Of the two, I think Bill would be the better, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. HRC -- yes, I'd love that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obiden Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. 'I did not have sexual relations with that woman'
alone would disqualify Bill Clinton from the superme court sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. I don't believe I mentioned Bill Clinton -- I think Hillary would be a good Justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. I agree wholeheartedly.
She would really be a strong voice in a place where we're getting our butts kicked.

God this election is so crucial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Wow. I never thought of that.
Just reading the words, a big goofy smile spread across my face. The cool thing about the SC, once they are there, they are free to be the true liberal wildcats I know they both have inside. What a neat idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. I don't want the third way on the court.
We have 4 strong, hard headed conservatives on the court. We need liberals to offset them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wow the education level is low in your state
Now someone that was disbarred will get appointed.

Great idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. No thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iiibbb Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. There are plenty of qualified judges out there...
... why put someone in there as a token.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
23. No, it would't be great. Neither is qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
24. No. That is a terribled idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
26. We need young liberal justices on the USSC.
Not older justices who will likely only stay on the court for a decade or so.

Besides, neither of them likely would want to do it and it would make the process of confirming a SCOTUS justice intensely political.

No thanks. There are plenty of talented liberal judges in reserve that we can use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. No. That is a TERRIBLE idea. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
29. That is a really stupid reason to select someone to SCOTUS, N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. No, I want Hillary to run again for president in the future.
As for Bill, he wouldn't be qualified thanks to the BS that led to the impeachment. Besides, why would he want it? He loves his foundation and it gives him freedom to pursue other interests.

But yes, the thought of seeing Repug heads explode is highly amusing. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
32. Not just no, but HELL no. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
33. i think hillary has a role in the upcoming adminstration
but probably not bill. I doubt he would go back into polotics.

Hillary could make a good attorney general though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freestyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
34. No. They are too old. The repubs appoint 40 and 50 somethings.
Yes, I said it. In terms of changing the direction of the court, we don't do ourselves any favors appointing justices who are 60 and over. Clinton's appointees may retire in the next administration. Bush's (1 and 2) will still be going strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
35. Bill Clinton is disbarred....
...he therefore cannot sit on the USSC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
36. Not really. He should find someone younger. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
37. No, it would be inflammatory and inappropriate to even consider when there are so many
Edited on Tue Oct-07-08 10:31 AM by ShortnFiery
better qualified candidates for the bench. Besides, IMO, Bill wouldn't be willing to take the pay cut due to canceled $peaking engagements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
38. I think this is very unlikely
I don't see either of them on the Supreme Court. I think Hillary would prefer to run for president again in 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Hear, hear!!!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC