Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Politico,com Good or bad?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:13 PM
Original message
Poll question: Politico,com Good or bad?
There is this mantra that continues to be chanted by a portion of DU that Politico.com is a RW e-rag. Do you agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other
No matter their bias - they are sometimes the first w/a story - so I vote worthy of checking out.

Many here won't agree with me and that's fine, I still go over there daily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Somewhat of a right-wing bias, but I still use it as one of my news sources.
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 01:17 PM by Phoonzang
I just take it's bias into account. I got there when I want to see a "mainstream" view of political news. HuffPo is nice and all, but they don't drive the media narrative. The Politico does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I second that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ben Smith isn't exactly on our side
But I don't think he's dead set against us either. I don't read much on Politico beyond his blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Is he supposed to be "for us"?
He is covering the Democratic side of the election. That doesn't mean he has to be biased towards us. WOuldn't you rather both he and Jonathan Martin be objective? That is his job afterall. Isn't it? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. They've been quite critical of McCain-Palin
so they're good enough for me I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Owned by corrupt RWer (Allbritton). Latent biased but needs the web traffic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC