Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Just Being Anti-Bush Is Not Enough To Win" by the Communist Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AmericanErrorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:00 AM
Original message
"Just Being Anti-Bush Is Not Enough To Win" by the Communist Party
Across the country there is a growing anti-Bush feeling, but that alone is not enough. To win requires that millions be convinced that the differences between Bush and Kerry are real, substantial and consequential to their lives on the whole range of issues: Social Security, Medicare, health care, overtime, minimum wage, public education, affirmative action, civil rights, reproductive rights, immigrant rights, gay rights, civil liberties, tax policy, environmental protection, Cuba, preemptive war, and nuclear weapons testing and use.

Even on Iraq, there are differences between the two. But more importantly, the defeat of Bush would be a repudiation of his policies of war and occupation, and that could not be ignored by a Kerry administration.

Thus, the remark heard in some left circles, "I will vote for Kerry but hold my nose," misses the point and is demobilizing. It may bring some momentary self-satisfaction to those expressing it. But it will do little to convince swing, undecided, or stay-at-home voters to go to the polls.

In my experience, aside from right wing talk show hosts and their loyal listeners, few people believe that Kerry is a candidate of the left and progressive movement. Most know that he is closely tied to the U.S. ruling class and a defender of capitalism, as is Bush.

That common class affiliation and fondness for the "free enterprise" system, however, doesn't prevent millions of voters from understanding that Kerry is a political centrist and espouses different policies than Bush.

Nor does it keep them from realizing that a Kerry victory would give the broader movements more political leverage than they now have.

The biggest danger in this election is not that people have unrealistic expectations of a Kerry administration, but rather that a substantial section of voters still believe that it doesn't make much of a difference who they vote for on Nov. 2. The responsibility of left and progressive people is not to spend their time bellyaching over Kerry's shortcomings, but to convince millions of people that there is a choice and that the outcome of this election will have enormous consequences for our nation's future.


http://www.cpusa.org/article/view/590
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. What this means is that Nader...
...is even to the left of the Communist Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Incredible. Even the FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR left wing of the
left sees the forest for the trees.

But nadir still can't.

The man has turned deluded AND corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm stunned.
Looks like the National Chair of the Communist Party didn't get the memo about Bush and Kerry being the same:

Given these circumstances, what should be the role of left and progressive people?

It is not to parse every word, vet every speech, and scrutinize every statement of Kerry. Nor is it to damn Kerry with faint praise. Rather its main task, as I see it, is to bring into sharper focus the differences in the two lines of policy represented by Kerry and Bush, to delineate the vastly improved political playing field that a Kerry victory would bring, and, above all, to become involved in the grassroots efforts to mobilize the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. CPUSA, even though I disagree with them...
Edited on Fri Aug-27-04 10:19 AM by LoZoccolo
...is actually vastly more moderate than a lot of the other communist groups out there. They're not a vanguard party for one thing, so they don't have this wilded-out fascination with grabbing power however they can (including collapsing the shit out of everything so people will come running to them). They have more of the temperment like Marx & Engels had in The Communist Manifesto, where they said that communists do not oppose any worker's party, because they felt that their system was an inevitability of history just like the democratic revolutions, and any reform that put things in their direction was good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick this. Kick this. Kick this!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Great. Commies are supporting Kerry. Just Wonderful.
How long before this gets repeated a million times by Pigboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. they've endorsed dem canidates for quite a while now
actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Nobody really cares about a Communist takeover anymore, except maybe
the real wackos.

They'll get very little mileage out of this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Fuck him, we'll just have to deal with that.
The right wing has this card because we let them have it year after year by letting it work for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. The "Communist party" in the US has been a joke for decades
and a well-worn borscht-circuit joke at that.

Move along, nothing to see here.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwantmycountryback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Communist party?
You mean both of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC