Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain's Man, Scheunemann, Lobbied AGAINST Bill to Keep Guns From TERRORISTS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:27 PM
Original message
McCain's Man, Scheunemann, Lobbied AGAINST Bill to Keep Guns From TERRORISTS

Scheunemann Lobbied Against Bill to Keep Guns From Terrorists
By Zachary Roth - August 26, 2008,

We knew Randy Scheunemann, John McCain's top foreign policy adviser, was into guns. After all, in 1997 he was arrested for having a shotgun and several rounds of ammunition in his car on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol. And in addition to his extensive lobbying work on behalf of former Soviet bloc countries, he's also a longtime lobbyist for gun-rights groups. But it now looks like, for Scheunemann, doing the bidding of the gun lobby takes precedence over efforts to combat terrorism.

Newsweek reports that, according to registration documents filed by Scheuenemann's lobbying firm, Orion Strategies, Scheunemann lobbied on behalf of the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) against a bill that aims to close a gun-control loophole that inhibits the government from stopping people on terrorist watch-lists from buying guns. According to Newsweek, "the bill was inspired by an official audit covering a five-month period in 2004 which found that, because of the loophole, the Feds had to greenlight 35 out of 44 cases where a gun buyer was on a terrorist watch list."

The bill, which is backed by the Bush Justice Department, was introduced last year by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), but has been held up in committee. It has since faced stiff opposition from the gun lobby, an aide to Lautenberg told TPMmuckraker, and has yet to come to a vote.

According to lobby disclosure reports, Scheunemann's firm was paid $120,000 by NSSF in 2007, and another $60,000 so far this year. Scheunemann himself took a leave of absence from the firm earlier this year to work on McCain's campaign.

Sen. McCain has not taken a position on the bill. His campaign would not tell Newsweek whether he supports it, or whether Scheunemann had ever lobbied McCain on gun-control issues.
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/john_mccain/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. No one gives a shit, I presume.
Now, if that was Obama's man, the convention wouldn't even matter anymore. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. We need to keep this kicked. Everyone should read it.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes we do. These people are a threat to us.......
and I don't want to wait until too late for us to figure that out.

I had a premonition about Bush before he was elected, and he turned out
exactly as I had felt that he would.

I feel worse about John McCain.
That ain't good. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Completely agree.
And I didn't think it was possible for me to feel worse about a candidate than I did about Bush. McMansions :scared: the crap out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. KNR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick!
I'm glad to see this in TPM - it's looked at a whole lot! Josh Marshall now has the kind of status as Kos and has been portrayed that way in other media. This is GOOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Until they straighten out the
problems with the "terrorist" list I am in total agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vapor Trails Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm torn!
On the one hand the terrorist watch lists are bogus. On the other hand we don't really want terrorists buying guns here.

:shrug:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ummm, so DU'ers support the administration's Secret Terrah Watch List now?
This was a BUSH ADMINISTRATION proposal.

Alberto "No Habeus Corpus" Gonzales PERSONALLY requested the power to revoke the gun rights of people he blacklists.

The secret watchlist, of course, contains the name of anyone the administration wishes to blacklist. Environmental activists, war protesters, and people who convert to Islam are all on the list. Senator Edward Kennedy was on the blacklist at one point.

Actual terrorism suspects, of course, are NOT on the list, because suddenly being barred from airplanes would tip them off that they are under government surveillance.

This administration, or any other, should NOT have the power to summarily revoke people's civil rights with zero due process, based on secret evidence, hearsay, and quotas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC