|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:35 AM Original message |
Does anyone here think the McCain camp had a couple attack ads banked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
1. Of course they did. Too bad they can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. So far all I've seen is that the McCaim camp has wasted a lot of money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
2. I'm sure they had several ads against all possible choices, and I'm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I won't give the media that much credit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kdillard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
4. That's like asking if the sky is blue? Of course they did and the media is just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seen the light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
5. They were going to attack for how REVEALING the pick was no matter what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:43 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Was that on their Word of the Day calendar? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
6. Yes and yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
9. "A McSame campaign insider, speaking on the condidtion of anonymity, confirms that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Of course.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC