Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The WH must be pressuring al-Maliki. Spokesman says he was "misunderstood".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jezebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:25 PM
Original message
The WH must be pressuring al-Maliki. Spokesman says he was "misunderstood".
Edited on Sat Jul-19-08 06:42 PM by jezebel
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/07/19/almaliki.obama/index.html
(CNN) -- A German magazine quoted Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki as saying that he backed a proposal by presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq within 16 months.
"U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months," he said in an interview with Der Spiegel that was released Saturday.

"That, we think, would be the right time frame for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes," he said.

But a spokesman for al-Maliki said his remarks "were misunderstood, mistranslated and not conveyed accurately."

Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said the possibility of troop withdrawal was based on the continuance of security improvements, echoing statements that the White House made Friday after a meeting between al-Maliki and U.S. President Bush.
---------------------------------------------------
More here from the NYTimes
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/19/maliki-ba... /

Update: A spokesman for the Iraqi prime minister has issued a statement saying his remarks were “misunderstood and mistranslated,” but did not address a specific error. Full statement below.

Update II: Dr. Ali al-Dabbagh, a spokesman for the Iraqi government, issued a statement saying Mr. Maliki’s statement had been “as not conveyed accurately regarding the vision of Senator Barack Obama, U.S. presidential candidate, on the timeframe for U.S. forces withdrawal from Iraq,” but it did not address a specific error. It did soften his support for Mr. Obama’s plan and implied a more tentative approach to withdrawing troops. More of the statement, which came from the U.S. military’s Central Command press office:
Al-Dabbagh explained that Mr. al-Maliki confirmed the existence of an Iraqi vision stems from the reality with regard to Iraq security needs, as the positive developments of the security situation and the improvement witnessed in Iraqi cities makes the subject of U.S. forces’ withdrawal within prospects, horizons and timetables agreed upon and in the light of the continuing positive developments on the ground, and security that came within the Strategic Plan for Cooperation which was laid and developed by Mr. Maliki and President George Bush. The Iraqi government appreciates and values the efforts of all the friends who continue to support and supporting Iraqi security forces.
Al-Dabbagh underscored that the statements made by the head of the ministerial council (Prime Minister al-Maliki) or any of the members of the Iraqi government should not be understood as support to any U.S. presidential candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just like with Merkel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Misunderstood, of course. Just like every other time someone steps out of line with bushco.
Puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw this coming. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hah....spin has begun...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icnorth Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. But a spokesman for al-Maliki said his remarks "were misunderstood,
mistranslated and not conveyed accurately."

Thanks Jez, been wondering where Big Dick was hiding out lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Busheil probably threatened to remove his security detail.
I guess he is their puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. let's go to the videotape!
the interview must have been recorded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jezebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. more here from the NYTimes >>>>
Edited on Sat Jul-19-08 06:37 PM by jezebel
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/19/maliki-backs-obamas-troop-withdrawal-plan/

Update: A spokesman for the Iraqi prime minister has issued a statement saying his remarks were “misunderstood and mistranslated,” but did not address a specific error. Full statement below.

Update II: Dr. Ali al-Dabbagh, a spokesman for the Iraqi government, issued a statement saying Mr. Maliki’s statement had been “as not conveyed accurately regarding the vision of Senator Barack Obama, U.S. presidential candidate, on the timeframe for U.S. forces withdrawal from Iraq,” but it did not address a specific error. It did soften his support for Mr. Obama’s plan and implied a more tentative approach to withdrawing troops. More of the statement, which came from the U.S. military’s Central Command press office:
Al-Dabbagh explained that Mr. al-Maliki confirmed the existence of an Iraqi vision stems from the reality with regard to Iraq security needs, as the positive developments of the security situation and the improvement witnessed in Iraqi cities makes the subject of U.S. forces’ withdrawal within prospects, horizons and timetables agreed upon and in the light of the continuing positive developments on the ground, and security that came within the Strategic Plan for Cooperation which was laid and developed by Mr. Maliki and President George Bush. The Iraqi government appreciates and values the efforts of all the friends who continue to support and supporting Iraqi security forces.
Al-Dabbagh underscored that the statements made by the head of the ministerial council (Prime Minister al-Maliki) or any of the members of the Iraqi government should not be understood as support to any U.S. presidential candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. What a bunch of pussies... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. 'Guess he wants to stay alive....
Did Cheney put a horse head in his bed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Der Spiegel needs to get the tape out
assuming they have it (be pretty boneheaded of them not too IMO), then let people decide for themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yet his clarification just re-iterates Obama's position even more
16 months isn't an unconditional deadline, it's an approximate time-table for the military to work toward. Obama has said this from the beginning, and has recently re-iterated this even though the media has called it "flip-flopping".

Maliki and Obama are on the same page and so while I'm sure he was coerced by Bush to say something more favorable to McGramps, his first statement was such a clear endorsement of Obama's plan that he can't really take it back.

I just wish we had video footage of Al-Maliki making that statement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maliki just got his pee-pee whacked
(You knew this was coming)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Probably, but what leverage does lame-duck schrub have anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. He can have him killed
before January 20th 12:01 pm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. (backpedaling as fast as he can). . . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Reference (in German) to statement in Spiegel
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,566832,00.html

16 Monaten aus dem Land abzuziehen. "Das, finden wir, wäre der richtige Zeitraum für den Abzug, geringe Abweichungen vorbehalten", sagte er im SPIEGEL-Interview.

Means something like ' 16 months . . . "That, we find would be the right time for the withdrawal, subject to minor differences," he said in the Spiegel interview.' (According to Google x-lation)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC