Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VP Talk: Webb's Rebel Roots: An Affinity for the Confederacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:11 PM
Original message
VP Talk: Webb's Rebel Roots: An Affinity for the Confederacy
Barack Obama’s vice presidential vetting team will undoubtedly run across some quirky and potentially troublesome issues as it goes about the business of scouring the backgrounds of possible running mates. But it’s unlikely they’ll find one so curious as Virginia Democratic Sen. Jim Webb’s affinity for the cause of the Confederacy.

Webb is no mere student of the Civil War era. He’s an author, too, and he’s left a trail of writings and statements about one of the rawest and most sensitive topics in American history.

He has suggested many times that while the Confederacy is a symbol to many of the racist legacy of slavery and segregation, for others it simply reflects Southern pride. In a June 1990 speech in front of the Confederate Memorial at Arlington National Cemetery, posted on his personal website, he lauded the rebels’ “gallantry,” which he said “is still misunderstood by most Americans.”

-snip-

Ron Walters, director of the African American Leadership Center at the University of Maryland and a professor of political science there, said Webb’s past writings and comments on the Confederacy could dampen enthusiasm for the Democratic ticket, should he appear on it.

“Unless he is able to explain it, it would raise some questions,” Walters said.

Edward H. Sebesta, co-author of the forthcoming “Neo-Confederacy: A Critical Introduction” (University of Texas Press), said Webb’s views express an unhealthy regard for a political system that propped up and defended slavery.

His book, in fact, will cite Webb as an example of the mainstreaming of neo-Confederacy ideas into politics, said Sebesta, a widely cited independent historical researcher and author of the Anti-Neo-Confederate blog.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10994.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go get that Southern vote!!!
I haven't looked at the things Webb has written, but if they spin him as a Neo-Confederate, he would be a head exploding Veep choice for the RWers. How could Obama hate Whitey and have a Pro-Whitey Veep?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, but it would alienate the African American voting bloc...
I'm not so hot on Webb, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. no AA I know would toss Obama cause of his veep choice
Really - he could pick Zell Miller, David Duke, or Alan Keyes and still bank on the AA vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. It's not just percentages, but numbers and enthusiasm.
Even a slight effect on these numbers amongst African Americans can seriously jeopardize some states. Such as PA, where I happen to be sitting right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. America gets what America deserves
If PA goes to McCain, America deserves fascism.

I can't fathom McCain winning, but, like I said, America gets what America deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I still want to keep EVERY Dem in the Senate.
At least until 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's a good point.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have an affinity with the confederacy too
The USA should be a club that members join and leave as they chose.
The USA should not be a gang = try and leave and we kill you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. I always wondered about that too
Shouldn't our union be voluntary? Why did war seem to be the first method chosen to preserve the union?

Still quite sad that the reason they didn't want to stay in the union was because they wanted to keep the institution of slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. AAs voted overwhelmingly for Webb in Virginia.
He couldn't have won without the black vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I just wonder how this would go over nationally
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. the more I learn about Webb, the more I don't like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. His resume is great. But no tingles up my leg.
;)

Really, I think it would be his bizarre former statements on women in the military that would be a bigger problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. There's that too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. the two of those together will not go over well at all. forget Webb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. And he's a sitting US Senator.
Can that be the third strike?

So I guess this is what "vetting" is for, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. What's this "gallantry" bullshit anyway
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 03:35 PM by tularetom
Webb is fond of reminding us of his "Scots-Irish" background. I know these folks - my ancestors were some of them (on my dad's side anyway). They lived in Appalachia and the "upcountry" of the southern atlantic states. They were suckered into taking up the cause of all the old rich white guys who owned slaves. They had none of their own - in fact they had very little. What they were was cannon fodder. They If Webb wants to rationalize their gullibility as gallantry that's fine but it doesn't reflect well on him.

They were used then - they're still being used. But they are either to dishonest or too dumb to realize who it is that's using them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I heard those statements and he was talking about how Obama can relate to the Scott - Irish, again I
...don't see the offense in the statements about the south and see them as an oppurtinity to create media buzz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Excellent points.
Why Webb (and I voted for him in 2006) feels it necessary to defend that gullibility as gallantry is beyond me. Part of the warrior ethos, I imagine.

I believe the Confederate State Declarations make it explicitly clear what secession was all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. As an AA I don't find anything offensive in Webbs confederacy views & see it as an oppurtinity
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 03:55 PM by uponit7771
...for Obama to use the media for press coverage to; 1.) Get the story out that Webb is a real southerner with southern view vs. Bush, 2.) Show that he and Obama can come to a consensus about the confederacy, 3.) Wash rinse repeat this story without losing a single AA vote.

I don't like it when confederate lovers hold on to the ideas of WHY the confederacy seceded as nothing to do with race but Webb isn't saying this.

I read it as; even if the people in the south didn't pay attention and fought for rich people to keep their riches while scaring the hell out of them they still were gallant fighters.

The parallel could be made today but in the mid 1800s no one had google!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. He apparently wouldn't argue "nothing to do with race",
but the summary is: "As in the Confederate Memorial speech, Webb suggests in his book that relatively few Southerners were slaveholders and that the war was fought over state sovereignty, which in the eyes of many at the time included the right to secede from the national government."

May I suggest that the same reasoning can be applied, with virtually no tweaking, to the Civil-Rights-era appearance of the stars-and-bars. The "code" is states rights, and while for many it's code, I bet you could find some that simply would agree that states rights were a real issue. The rest is a question of percentages and whether or not what people said is to be taken as correct.

That would go over poorly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm an African-American and I greatly admire the temerity
of Sen. Webb. I thought he would make a great VP choice for Sen. Obama, but not after learning of his "Jonny Rebel" loving tendencies this morning, I don't want him anyplace close to the office of the Presidency.

I knew that Sen. Webb was a republican that decided to switch sides when he realized that * and the neocons were nuts, but I didn't know about this......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. What is he sayin about the solidiers who fought for the south that is offensive to you as an AA? Thx
My post above explains my position.

This sounds like a hit piece story on Webb, from what I've read there's NOTHING the guy said that was offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Anyone that can openly admire a society or government
in which they decide to oppress large segments of the population based on conditions over which the oppressed have no control (skin color, height, weight, eye color, whatever) may as well become a horrible monster to me.

To my mind, Jim Webb might as well say, "Hitler and those nazis had Germany moving along for several years. The economy was humming, there was zero unemployment and productivity in their factories was off the charts from the late 20s up until the early 40s. It's a shame they had to kill all those Jews while they were doing all these good things!"

I realize that it may be unfair to paint with such a broadbrush, but that's just the way I feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. The problem with this is whose opinions are validated
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 04:49 PM by loyalsister
"Even the Vice President thinks flying the confederate flag is okay" would be a common interpretation that would be used to flaunt the offensive symbol.
"Even the VP thinks the south was right" and on and on.
It's kind of like how racists love to say they call each other the n word.
Misinterpretation have a lot of traction for belief in belief.

This makes a too good to be true ticket for the most hate filled racists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
26. I don't think Webb will be VP
not a good choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. Cross him off the list. If we're going after VA. Its going to be Warner or Kaine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. That's troubling. Keep in mind, we have to deal with this VP in 8 years
If Al Gore had won the Supreme Court fight, we would be dealing with "President Lieberman" right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. One more thing-we can't let Politico be in control of our vetting process
despite Webb's problems, he would be a plus to Obama as far as possibly helping to secure certain "working hardworking" voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC